Recent content by patch

Not sure what you had in mind there. Maybe * name & MACAddress match -> proceed without user intervention * name or MACAddress match -> user confirmation required to update non matching item noting total requiring user confirmation * neither name or MACAddress match but outstanding interface...

Ouch That sound stressful. No doubt different decisions would be chosen for your 6TB data in hind sight. An off site disk is good to have going forwards.

This thread discussed options fairly thoroughly https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/how-to-backup-proxmox-configuration-files.67789/

Have you tried setting Sockets:1 and cores to your total core count for that VM. If it achieves throughput and reliability goals, the reasons could be investigated later.

So why does the Proxmox update GUI not include them by default? Or is it planned to include relevant components after they have been tested in the Proxmox environment?

Interested in this also. Similar application. Use custom built "all in one router" consisting of Proxmox, pfsense, 3cx, Unifi application. Similar at 2 sites. Have spare unit for lab & recovery from failure. Like to make more active use of the "spares" as HTPC. So need HDMI out from a VM on...

Done https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4849

pfsense runs on FreeBSD just as Proxmox runs on Debain. In both there is nothing stopping you adding upstream packages and user specific modifications. pfsense has a GUI utility to backup the norml pfsense configuration, the extra user specific additions then must be separately handled by those...

I suggest starting with this thread https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/how-to-backup-proxmox-configuration-files.67789/ Particularly posts #27 and #32

There is a 2012 bugzilla entry

See this thread for a more detailed discussion novnc: copy paste not works

See this thread https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/novnc-copy-paste-not-works.19773/

Imo, ignore wear and just use the SSD. If it wears out then replace it. 7% per year means it will reach 100% in 14 years & I suspect you will throw it out before then.

I agree status of hardware is important information Temperature of hardware rates not far behind Ram usage and Disk usage in terms of node stability. Showing devices with failed SMART status is similar. Ideally this information would be shown together in the GUI summary page for each server...

Imo that would be a bad idea. I often have different VM which would use the same resource, but don't simultaneously as I do not run both VM at the same time. If your idea was implemented consistently a VM with pass through could not be copied. In summary showing resources currently in use is a...