Recent content by JimBeam

Proxmox does not use a debian kernel but a modified redhat one, so you'd have to factor that in as well.

Please use the bug tracker to file feature requests like this.... and this seems like a very sensible feature request!

Proxmox is Debian. You can adapt Debian info, including that on shorewall, to proxmox.

I've installed samba on the host and created a share that the VM can access. There may well be other ways; I'd be interested in the possibility of attaching a virtual disk as well (same functionality exists in VirtualBox to share host directories).

Great news, thanks for the work and posting this!

The same kernel? Are you sure? You know there was just a new kernel released again for proxmox 3, right?

I suppose that may be because Proxmox 1 and 2 are not supported [1] and you could look at upgrading to Proxmox 3... If not, you could perhaps contact the proxmox guys for a support contract to cover those old versions. [1] I read in a forum post that fixes won't be backported - which IMO is...

Thanks, installation went smoothly here, too.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Option for not deleting the OpenVZ private directory while migra As indicated in the wiki, please file your improvement request at https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ Thanks.

Could you please report this to the bugtracker so the devs can keep track of it and hopefully fix it? https://bugzilla.proxmox.com Thanks

Have a look at the options to execute a command on the guest from the host - AFAIR, that can work using containers.

@webbytech: I'd think it's a better idea to post feature request to the bug tracker. Bigger chance the devs will look at it...

As indicated above, file a feature request in the bugtracker if it does not already exist.

Congratulations! Just upgraded from 2.3 without problems using the script. My router kvm seems snappier, but that may just be wishful thinking ;)

Create an issue with the bugtracker with that request :p