Recent content by AFrenchCompany

What is the current status of this issue ? Have you managed to get the BCM57416 working reliably ?

> [SOLVED] - Multiple DKIM - New reply to watched thread Seeing this in my mailbox got me excited, but false alarm :)

My bad, we can actually see that garbage collect job from the Dashboard page. It's at 29%. No idea why it didn't show on the other page. Topic can be considered closed.

Hi, We have the following odd behavior root@backup:~# proxmox-backup-manager garbage-collection status rpool ┌──────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Name │ Value...

Up. I tried applying tons of restrictions using systemd inside the LXC instead (InaccessiblePaths, NoExecPaths...), but clearly that's twisting its purpose and AppArmor would be the right tool for the job.

Hi, Can someone with solid experience in AppArmor + PVE confirm if this is the correct way to enable AppArmor inside an unprivileged LXC? The goal is to add specific profiles within the LXC to enhance security. Here's the line I'm considering for /etc/pve/lxc/XXX.conf lxc.mount.entry...

Thanks for the reply. > have you actually mounted the containers root filesystem before starting the restore I did not. I ended up dumping a backup on a basic folder storage, to be able to use pct restore, which did work.

I'm currently having the same issue. Initially I wanted to restore a privileged to unprivileged. The WebUI fails on that so I added added the necessary parameters in CLI but it throws the same errors as OP. lxc-usernsexec -m u:0:100000:65536 -m g:0:100000:65536 -- /usr/bin/proxmox-backup-client...

Could someone from the Proxmox team clarify the challenges in offering arm64 .deb packages or a deb-src repository? Some of us may be able to contribute PR, hardware, or financial resources to help. Just to state the obvious but, arm64 is gaining serious steam so this topic should become of...

I've applied the patch and can confirm that it works great. If I may suggest something though, CustomCheck doesn't follow the same casing as other rules. For consistency sake it could be more appropriate to display it as CUSTOM_CHECK

Thank you for investigating :) Indeed, the script returns in the [-2,2] range which include negative values for emails it deems to be probably not spam.

The output seems aligned with what the documentation states. Yet I still get custom check error: got unexpected output! root@spamfilter:~# /usr/local/bin/pmg-custom-check v1 /var/spool/pmg/spam/A0/2F9A966700405B62A0 v1 SCORE: 1.91 Am I missing something regarding what the custom check is...

I used the Custom Check Interface feature of PMG. I have a script that properly queries my model and returns a score. But I cannot see that score anywhere in the X-SPAM-LEVEL. Is this expected ? Script is in /usr/local/bin/pmg-custom-check `custom_check 1` has been changed to /etc/pmg/pmg.conf...

There seems to be a way by creating a SpamAssassin Perl plugin, which in turn would call the python script or API. If no recommendations are made around here, I will try this method and update the thread. Hopefully that could help others.

Hi, I have trained a small model with highly curated spam and ham from our own PMG instance. The model is behaving extremely well and I would like to use it to alter the spam score from PMG's spamassassin slightly. Currently, * the model can be ran in CLI in a conda env * it accepts an .eml...