Latest activity
-
Ccelemine1gig replied to the thread timeout waiting for systemd.Man sieht eindeutig, dass du keine Ahnung hast. Fragen nach Details stellen? Unverschämt. Du könntest ja auch einfach mal die Lösung präsentieren. Würde uns allen das Leben erleichtern. :) @antiager Und nun nochmal ein wenig ernster: Da du ja...
-
CKlar, ist immer ein Gute Idee die KI zu fragen - Menschen brauchen ja auch keine Infos zur Hardware auf der das ganze läuft. Auch nicht wie das konfiguriert ist. ZFS, Sicher läuft. Meine Glaskugel fragt, ob da vielleicht auch noch ein bischen...
-
Ssteve999 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Error with file restore on pve with pbsbackup.That "Operation not supported (os error 95)" is EOPNOTSUPP, which is a useful clue. The restore daemon VM mounts the backup and the kernel refuses a specific operation on that file, so this looks less like corruption (verification passing...
-
Ddelltech1 replied to the thread [PROJECT] BASTRIX SharedLVM for Proxmox VE 9 — FC/iSCSI Storage with Thin Pools, Thick Generations and Multipath Safety.Good question — this is one of the main safety concerns the plugin was designed around. SharedLvmThin does not rely on multiple PVE nodes independently modifying LVM metadata at the same time. All shared-LVM metadata mutations are serialized...
-
GGalaxis replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.Haven't seen it mentioned in the kernel package Changelog, but the block device statistics regression indeed seems to be solved with 7.0.14-15-pve, at least on the system I tested it on for the past couple of days. Thanks!
-
Ffortechitsolutions replied to the thread Q: pve8to9 sanity check "pre flight check script" for upgrade > does not flag "cgroup V1 Removal" drama?.Ah, ha, this is funny. Looking at output from the script, next day/ now that I am reading it and not quite so sleep deprived, it tells me clearly, "SKIP: NOTE: Expensive checks, like CT cgroupv2 compat, not performed without '--full' parameter"...
-
BYou can use the host CPU in the virtual machine settings, and it should work.
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread [PROJECT] BASTRIX SharedLVM for Proxmox VE 9 — FC/iSCSI Storage with Thin Pools, Thick Generations and Multipath Safety.How do you ensure the consistency and that there are no conflicting writes from multiple nodes?
-
JJohannes S reacted to fba's post in the thread Which file system for 100 + 140 TB Veeam servers and repositories? with
Like.
You mentioned RAID devices so ZFS is not an option, it needs direct disk access instead. -
JJohannes S reacted to aaron's post in the thread Memory ballooning doesn't reduce host RAM usage? with Like.
I took a look at the code again, and AFAIU (which might be wrong), pvestatd initiates the Balloon changes here: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=blob;f=PVE/Service/pvestatd.pm;h=34f9da71fd05ee3c9c5cd1e09d25fe9832eb3364;hb=HEAD#l296...
-
JJohannes S reacted to leesteken's post in the thread Memory ballooning doesn't reduce host RAM usage? with Like.
I think "ask" is putting it too mildly. As I understand it: the memory is simply taken without negotiation or consideration, which can cause OoM-kills inside the VM (if the user sets the minimum memory too low or memory cannot be released quickly...
-
JJohannes S reacted to _gabriel's post in the thread Memory ballooning doesn't reduce host RAM usage? with Like.
from the docs : https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Dynamic_Memory_Management#Requirements_for_Linux_VM
-
JJohannes S reacted to aaron's post in the thread Memory ballooning doesn't reduce host RAM usage? with Like.
Once the threshold is reached, the host will ask the VMs to return memory to the host. The VMs need to be able to return that memory! That means, a way to communicate with the host via the Ballooning device, and free memory that can be returned...
-
fba replied to the thread Any way to isolate VMs on same VLANs/bridge?.Proxmox VE uses conntrack, to flush it's tables run in a node shell conntrack -F -
Eexterrestris replied to the thread Kernel oops when passing through Adaptec ASR-72405 (aacraid) to VM on kernel 7.0+.Ultimately, although the memory limitation under 7.0 is annoying, running the VM with 10GB allocated is perfectly acceptable for my use case. On the other hand, the aacraid unbinding issue that I raised initially is a clear regression from 6.17...
-
BBu66as replied to the thread timeout waiting for systemd.Das timeout beim Start kommt meistens daher, dass der alte qemu-Prozess noch nicht sauber weg ist und der scope deshalb blockiert. Deshalb hilft nur ein Host-Reboot. Das Problem ist das Hängen davor. Schau ins journal vom Host für den Zeitpunkt...
-
SteveITS replied to the thread Any way to isolate VMs on same VLANs/bridge?.I’ve not tried this here but in my experience with other firewalls, if a connection/state is open adding a drop rule will not close it as the allowed open state still exists. IOW end the ping then enable the rule. -
fba replied to the thread Any way to isolate VMs on same VLANs/bridge?.I did it like this: https://www.croit.io/blog/microsegmentation-with-proxmox-ve
-
fba reacted to aaron's post in the thread Memory ballooning doesn't reduce host RAM usage? with Like.
I took a look at the code again, and AFAIU (which might be wrong), pvestatd initiates the Balloon changes here: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=blob;f=PVE/Service/pvestatd.pm;h=34f9da71fd05ee3c9c5cd1e09d25fe9832eb3364;hb=HEAD#l296...
