Hi Longer,
Thank you very much for your reply. I tried following your suggestion and changed the controller from SCSI to SATA, but unfortunately this didn't solve the problem. The machine is still behaving in exactly the same way...
I have already added the nconnect=2 into the storage.cfg and will remount the nfs tonight and test that first.
Then this weekend i can do the nfs readahead setup this weekend and benchmark it.
I might also just move the vm off this node so i can...
After further research I found that I have to vacuum out journalctl logs with the following commands on each node:
journalctl --vacuum-time=2d
systemctl restart systemd-journald
Now, when I choose the Live Mode - I get instant result (as...
Read the manual:
https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/maintenance.html#pruning
https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/maintenance.html#garbage-collection
As often as you need it. This depends on how much backups you want to keep, how much storage you have and...
We have recently migrated 18 hosts from esxi to proxmox for our Citrix VDI estate and so far very pleased with the results. This was straightforward as everything is imaged from a single gold image, and pxe booted to a cloned disk.
We are now...
Of course that matters but you observed nothing there which is fine !
Just 14Gbit during test is the result of your slow nfs connection yet, would be full at 23 Gbit when fixed (even with/without vm load at test time).
nvme's have ~1/3 less...
I had a different issue while importing Debian11 and Ubuntu 12, for me it didn't boot at all, and only after switching to SATA it worked.
therefore this is Just my 2 cent here, I would try since its quick change to switching the virtual disk bus...
okay, thanks. I now understand. I still think, that at least for running machines the actual version should be displayed or that at least something else than the _wrong_ version 5.1 should be displayed but I understand why it happens.
We are excited to announce the first release of Proxmox Virtual Environment with official support for a second CPU architecture: 64-bit ARM (arm64/aarch64). Until now, Proxmox VE was available for x86-64 (amd64) only.
Proxmox VE 9.2 for arm64...
Support here from volunteering strangers on the internet is indeed pretty good. Proxmox staff also visits but I feel that their time here is limited and sometimes spread thin, so I also think about them as volunteers.
EDIT: If you need guaranteed...
Thanks for looking at this. I will add nconnect=2 on PVE01 and rerun the test.
I did not have zpool iostat running on truenas during the original benchmark.
I did have PRTG monitoring the network interface that the truenas is connected to...
Hallo zusammen,
ich hocke momentan an einem Konzept für ein Disaster Recovery zwischen zwei Standorten.
Mich würde mal interessieren, ob meine Idee so umgesetzt werden kann, und was eure Meinung dazu ist.
Folgendes Szenario:
Standort A und...
We are excited to announce the first release of Proxmox Virtual Environment with official support for a second CPU architecture: 64-bit ARM (arm64/aarch64). Until now, Proxmox VE was available for x86-64 (amd64) only.
Proxmox VE 9.2 for arm64...
OK, some first feedback: After my last post it only took 2-3 days until I had a freeze again. I then moved all Docker containers into a Debian VM (multiple containers per VM) and switched off all LXCs that were running Docker. Since then nil...
The official port is there, no support for raspberry though: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-now-available-for-64-bit-arm-arm64.185526/
So, you didn't need to wait a lot to see your speculation was correct:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-now-available-for-64-bit-arm-arm64.185526/
Then you propably have the community subscription. It's main point is access to the enterprise repo and removal of the nag screen. The enterprise repo gets updated packages after the others so it's more unlikely to run into bugs. Please note...