Hey, thanks for your feedback!
I did discuss something along those lines internally before with @fiona. The fully-automatic generation is likely a bit too much magic, and there is a fundamental problem in that kernel/microcode updates can change...
Thank you for bringing that to my attention and maybe I can add to that. My template is on the current patch level, so the problem may not be the same, but very similar.
Sorry for the late reply, missed this thread in the new posts section.
This was already stated some of the other answers, but this is the expected behavior:
HA resources are by default configured with "failback" enabled. Failback in that sense...
Depending on how it was installed, this file may not exist, but in cases where there are issues with PvE, the file listed below will be present.
Deleting that file, updating GRUB, and rebooting should fix the problem.
rm...
Hi!
If I understand your description correctly, this is expected behavior.
As HA resources are "failback" by default and the HA resource is in a non-strict node affinity rule, the HA Manager does not allow the migration. This is because the HA...
Hey, thanks for your feedback!
I did discuss something along those lines internally before with @fiona. The fully-automatic generation is likely a bit too much magic, and there is a fundamental problem in that kernel/microcode updates can change...
Oh man. MS macht allen Admins Probleme. Meiden so weit es geht. Sei froh, dass man es so oft meiden kann. Wenn die Leute mit ihrer ranzigen Branchensoftware um die Ecke kommen, gehts halt nicht anders. Aber im E-Mail und VM Bereich geht es anders.
A couple of comments:
1. Since you're deploying client assets in a cluster, there are two components to consider- first, what is your target overprovision/overall host load threshold and second- when deploying a new asset, you have a choice of...
Hi, a few questions:
License — there's no LICENSE file in the repo. What license do you plan to use, and can we get explicit permission to use/modify it commercially in the meantime?
Maintenance — last commit was ~3 months ago. Is this actively...
Thank you for bringing that to my attention and maybe I can add to that. My template is on the current patch level, so the problem may not be the same, but very similar.
I encounter a similar maybe related trim problem that is solvable by reducing the machine version to 9.2+pve1. I was able to replicate this in a fully patches W2K25 server template in CEPH and ZFS...
Hi all,
Closing the loop on this thread with good news: the issue is fixed.
After corosync and libknet1t64 were updated to 3.1.10-pve3 / 1.35-pve1 (available now in pve-no-subscription), ip_dscp works as documented. I tested on two separate...
Thank you for your feedback.
When I refer to “client,” I’m actually talking about internal users of the applications. Currently, certain (technical) staff members have the autonomy to manage snapshots, restart VMs, or perform other types of...
The thing with setups that aren't officially recommended or supported by the developers of a product is that they're unsupported for a reason: they simply aren't something the developers explicitly test or validate.
For example, when the Proxmox...
Genau darum würde es mich ernsthaft interessieren. Dank fixen IPs kannst du die Festen Regeln, bzgl Netzzonen IMHO viel eleganter und eventuell sogar sicherer umsetzen. Aber wenn du nicht willst, nehmen wir halt ein Bier zusammen :)
Here's my current thoughts/opinions about running docker/podman in CTs
- It currently works fine (at least in a debian CT)
- It might break on docker (related) or kernel updates
- Breakage is likely to be fixed soon but you'll have to be patient...