Latest activity
-
Wwaltar reacted to raipvs's post in the thread Problem with rsync mtime preservation since update to kernel 6.17.13-6-pve (solved by avoidance of nfs 4.2) with
Like.
I have the same problem on Proxmox 9.2.4 with kernel 7.0.14-3-pve as NFS-Server and NFS-clients running 7.x kernels. A workarround for me is to mount the filesystem with NFS version 4.1: mount -o vers=4.1 SERVER:/DIR /mnt I guess it is a kernel bug. -
Wwaltar reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Problem with rsync mtime preservation since update to kernel 6.17.13-6-pve (solved by avoidance of nfs 4.2) with Like.
Hi, @skraw I wonder if you really mean atime... Though you wrote "atime" both in the subject and inside the post. But by default, rsync's decision whether to copy a file or not, doesn't depend on atime. It depends on mtime (and the size). From...
-
EEAnushan replied to the thread Problem with rsync mtime preservation since update to kernel 6.17.13-6-pve (solved by avoidance of nfs 4.2).I can confirm I'm running into the same bug. root@proxmox:~# pveversion pve-manager/9.2.4/5e5ae681198514d4 (running kernel: 7.0.14-4-pve) I was using rclone to sync some files to an NFS share hosted on my Proxmox node. After a sync, running a...
-
TTarzoq reacted to fabian's post in the thread Receiving "pipelined request failed: update atime failed for chunk/file" when backing up to backup proxmox server? with Like.
I don't know how unraid handles that. the command would be "chown -R backup:backup /backups", but it might require some changes on the unraid side as well before that works..
-
Aa3a replied to the thread [SOLVED] NVIDIA DKMS driver failure on Proxmox VE 9.2.4 with kernel 7.0.x (Quadro P2000) — seeking guidance.I haven't had good luck using the distribution bundled drivers. Howwever, I am succesfully using 580.173.02 downloaded directly from NVidia on my venerable GTX1080 I used: ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-580.173.02.run --no-install-compat32-libs...
-
Bbindi replied to the thread [SOLVED] NVIDIA DKMS driver failure on Proxmox VE 9.2.4 with kernel 7.0.x (Quadro P2000) — seeking guidance.Nice AI post. Too old drivers for too new of a kernel. EOL hardware.
-
news replied to the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox crashing, hardware issue?.Why is there a Proxmox VE v8.4.19 running? What CPU Type do you use? So get the lshw programm with apt install lshw. for the Asrock X470D4U you can download the English manual. and on Page 22 you find: So your 2666 MT/s is normal with 4x DDR4... -
-
NNevadaTech posted the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox crashing, hardware issue? in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello, I have a server crashing and I'd like some help. Please! Over the last couple weekend I've had a small maintenance window where I could take it offline for a couple hours. This weekend is a longer window so I'd like to get as much testing...
-
CCycloneB replied to the thread WebUI Syslog Font.No add-on in the browser, but totally possible I tweaked a setting over the years. No tweaks on the new node as that's how it looked from the first login to the web UI.
-
NNevadaTech replied to the thread [SOLVED] No /boot after PVE 8 to 9 upgrade.Oy, bit by this bug also. Extra input... I wasn't sure which disk was my booter, other posts say 'EFI BIOS' partition, I have 'BIOS boot' and 'EFI System' partitions, so which is it? for me it was the EFI System partition my guessing was based...
-
TTErxleben replied to the thread verify state failed.Der OP hat seine Situation doch geschildert. Da sind so viele Fußfehler drin, dass es sinnlos ist ein log zu analysieren. Nebenbei hat er nur sporadische Fehler.
-
JJohannes S reacted to tcabernoch's post in the thread PBS InfluxDB2/Grafana External Metric Server with Like.
Hi Thomas Thanks for the follow up. This is what I got from my boss. All he originally wanted from me was to setup the Influx data collection so it could be piped to our own reporting database. (I went ahead and built out the Grafana stuff...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Use ZFS Special vdev with Raid 5.While I would agree with RAIDZ1 for obvious reasons, RAID5 can still be useful if (and only if!) the controller has a battery cache to speedup the HDD access. Although it would propably still perform better with a switch to RAID1/RAID10
-
JJohannes S reacted to IsThisThingOn's post in the thread Use ZFS Special vdev with Raid 5 with Like.
PBS is mostly metadata read, so instead of svdev I would go with L2ARC. There you are free to use one drive or three drive in RAID0 or whatever. PS: please not that I would highly discourage you from such a wonky setup in general. RAID5 or...
-
JJohannes S reacted to Falk R.'s post in the thread Ideale Server-Konfig für externen Speicher with Like.
Ich glaube dein Hauptproblem ist tatsächlich Kopfsache. Wenn Speicher knapp wird, stecke einfach eine oder mehrere Disks nach. Getrennt sichern, erhöht die Komplexität, aber diese gefühlte Sicherheit ist keine, denn wenn ein Backup kaputt geht...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread verify state failed.Ich sehe jetzt nicht den Widerspruch, der OP sollte doch beides tun: Einerseits, um überhaupt wieder Backups zu haben (finde ich nicht sooo unwichtig) und zum anderen um solche Fehler zu vermeiden. Aber ohne Taskslogs kann man da halt schlecht...
-
JBeantworte erst mal die Frage von Dominik. Ja die backups sind defekt, aber retten kann man eventuell die Daten. Wenn die defekten Chunks noch auf der Quellseite (PVE) vorhanden sind und die noch einmal gesichert werden können, ist es eventuell...
-
WWarum an Sicherungen puzzlen, wenn die Hütte nicht brennt? Die gleiche Zeit sollte man lieber investieren um zu verstehen, warum die Probleme überhaupt entstehen und bestenfalls beseitigen.
-
Wwaltar replied to the thread Use ZFS Special vdev with Raid 5.That's right but only 4 hdd's are given. raid1+raid10 with hybrid-xfs works too as for a raid1+raid6 you want much more hdd's. But anyway doing raid1/raidz/raid5 without configured hot-spare is quiet risky !!
-
I like to use this: https://github.com/VoltKraft/PBS_Chunk_Checker
