Hallo,
ich würde gern ein etwas überfälliges Update von Proxmox 8.0.4 auf die aktuellere 8.4er Version durchführen. Leider lässt mich Proxmox nicht updaten.
Wir betreiben hier einen Cluster mit 2 Membern, beide mit jeweils eigenen, aktiven...
Thanks all for replies.
Got to admit I usually just keep default settings as I figure Proxmox knows better than me. Thin provision is off my default and I think there might be arguments that this is the safer option until you have massive...
Therefore I did not specify the disk. If you do, you need -r as option
So you missed checking the thin provision box in your storage configuration in the PVE UI:
Might I suggest you also review the caching you have set on the VM disk? In OP I'm reading that the subsystem is ZFS.
Its my undertanding the recommendation is not to set any caching on VM disks themselves when using ZFS to avoid precisely what...
I don't recall any issues with the 7.0 kernel and bridge forwarding. You could try out the old 6.17 kernel and see if it works there (https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Host_Bootloader#sysboot_kernel_pin).
Otherwise please post:
ip -d link show vmbr0...
> where this setup is very straightforward because VMware provides features such as:
If you want something that works just like VMware, please use VMware.
Proxmox offers the features available in Proxmox.
If you want to use a cluster, please...
before we dive too deep into snapshots and their storage consumption, we should IMHO look first at two more important issues.
I would argue that running RAIDZ1 is unsafe. Dell marked RAID5 to be against best practice and unsafe something around...
Update (July 2nd, 2026) — Problem further narrowed down
After extensive additional troubleshooting, we have isolated the issue to a single, clear symptom:
The Linux bridge silently drops incoming unicast frames to TAP interfaces — despite a...
I setup a test PVE with a test VM and then "zfs set refreservation=none My-Storage/vm-100-disk-1" This seemed to reduce the VM disk usage immediately and when creating a snapshot doesn't use extra storage
On Production... zfs get refreservation...
@MichalCirrus or @Stoiko Ivanov, could you please update the post title to mention that the issue appears after the 9.2 upgrade specifically on OVHcloud servers (and fix the typo in rEFInd)? It may help search engines find the post more easily.
Thank you. You were right that the Spam Detector size was configured to only 262144 bytes (256 KB), while the SMTP proxy accepts 50 MB messages. I have increased the Spam Detector size and will monitor whether this resolves the DKIM "BODY HAS...
Thank you. You were right that the Spam Detector size was configured to only 262144 bytes (256 KB), while the SMTP proxy accepts 50 MB messages. I have increased the Spam Detector size and will monitor whether this resolves the DKIM "BODY HAS...
Mit "Intel-Netzwerktechnik" ist sicherlich die 1000er Threads zum Thema Intel e1000 gemeint.
Einfach mal den Goo* nutzten: intel e1000 site:forum.proxmox.com
@news: Der 4650G hat wie der 5650G auch 6C/12T, aber ich verstehe was du meinst: min. 6C und den 5000er weil er neuer ist und somit effizienter.
Soll das heißen, dass die verbaute Intel-Technik gerne mal aussteigt oder wie darf man das...
You can call something like this:
zfs list -t snapshot -r rpool # rpool is the pool name
And check on github zfs with checkzfs --sourceonly, if you run, so i do, automatic zfs snapshots.
So i can see, if the apt package zfs-auto-snapshot work...