Latest activity
-
Sswiperman replied to the thread Proxmox 9 and nftables status.Hi Christoph, thanks for your reply. Here is the output of pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 9.2.0 (running kernel: 7.0.6-2-pve) pve-manager: 9.2.2 (running version: 9.2.2/b9984c6d90a4bd80) proxmox-kernel-helper: 9.2.0 proxmox-kernel-7.0: 7.0.6-2...
-
AArnOCP replied to the thread All VM can't accessible after kernel UPdate of the nodes?.That's what I was afraid of^^ I can't do it right now, because the PvE servers are hosting functional servers.
-
DDomino replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.Hi Fiona, /etc/systemd/network/eth0.network [Match] Name = eth0 [Network] Description = Interface eth0 autoconfigured by PVE Address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/16 Gateway = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx DHCP = no IPv6AcceptRA = false 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP>...
-
Ssterua32 replied to the thread how to set quorum 3 on 6 nodes cluster ?.nvm, we cant add more than 1 qdevice :) in any case thanks for the help:)
-
Gguruevi replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Most of the data you ask about is really irrelevant. The point was to drive the system to some kind of unified performance peak, what CPU and whether virtual or hardware and exact test design is rather irrelevant as long as they are the same, so...
-
JHi! In more detail, each node's current cpu and memory usage is normalized with its own capacity (i.e. cpu_load = current_cpu / max_cpu and memory_load = current_memory / max_memory), where the node's current load is then a equal-weighted...
-
JNo worries, and the manual can always be improved though I didn't put in the technical explanation from above as it felt too specific. If it's useful there as well, I can certainly find a way to put it there without being too distracting from the...
-
Jj.theisen replied to the thread Routed setup on Hetzner with Failover IPs: "Destination Host Unreachable.Hi @Karcsi thanks for posting in the forum! Hetzner is sadly a little bit tricky to get up and running. On a quick search for previous answers on this topic i found this post [1]. Maybe this can help you also. Apart from that, may i ask why...
-
Jj.theisen replied to the thread CRS Load Balancer - tech preview or not?.Hi @limone thanks for posting in the forum! You are correct, the tech preview banner in the docs is a remnant of the previous testing. As of PVE 9.2 CRS Load balancing is considered stable. We will update the docs asap. Thanks for noticing...
-
GGilberto Ferreira replied to the thread free Starwind x Proxmox SAN storage plugin.I totally agree with that.
-
GGilberto Ferreira reacted to alma21's post in the thread free Starwind x Proxmox SAN storage plugin with
Like.
I think this is a misunderstanding .... the plugin which I mentioned can be used with any iscsi/FC SAN ... it's an open source shared/clustered lvm thin proxmox storage plugin developed by Starwind -
dakralex replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.No worries, and the manual can always be improved though I didn't put in the technical explanation from above as it felt too specific. If it's useful there as well, I can certainly find a way to put it there without being too distracting from the... -
Ssterua32 replied to the thread how to set quorum 3 on 6 nodes cluster ?.Thanks @leesteken for your answer. So, if i understand correctly, i can, on any other server in my server room 2, install corosync-qnetd (and on all my 6 cluster nodes corosync-qdevice ), and then setup it by pvecm qdevice setup <QDEVICE-IP> so...
-
Ssterua32 posted the thread how to set quorum 3 on 6 nodes cluster ? in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi all. I have a pve 9.1 cluster of 6 nodes. 3 nodes are in server room 1 and 3 others nodes are in server room 2. For now, i need 4 nodes for quorum for my cluster (when i do corosync-quorumtool -s, i have Quorum: 4) Monday, i need to halt all...
-
EIt seems like you still have an IP address configured on vmbr0: 10.7.20.10/24 which causes the ifquery check to fail. Is this a leftover from a previous configuration, since you seem to have the same subnet configured as well on vmbr0.20? In...
-
Eetfz replied to the thread [SOLVED] SDN error status.Thanks! 10.7.20.10/24 is actually a virtual keepalive address. I think I might have previously used vmbr0 for PVE management. I have now moved the keepalive configuration to vmbr0.20, which has cleared the SDN errors.
-
Wwoma replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Hi Daniel, thanks for the reply. And sorry for not "RTFM" ... but that would not have answered my question 100% anyway. :cool: BR Marcus
-
JJohannes S reacted to jabuzzard's post in the thread Server hardware recommendations for new 3–4 node Proxmox VE / Ceph cluster with Like.
I think anything is going to be horribly over budget right now. The AI bubble has made RAM and SSDs, in particular, very expensive, and there are pandemic-level delays for ConnectX network cards. Even though our order was placed in a mad scramble...
-
G_gabriel reacted to dominiaz's post in the thread [Feature Request] Proxmox 9.0 - iothread-vq-mapping with Like.
Github iothread-vq-mapping updated to support for Proxmox 9.2.2 ISO - https://github.com/dominiaz/iothread-vq-mapping New features: Virtio/SCSI support and Hotplug. You can set VQ Mapping over Proxmox Web Gui. If you want to upgrade Proxmox VE...
-
KKarcsi posted the thread Routed setup on Hetzner with Failover IPs: "Destination Host Unreachable in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Message: Hi, I am having a massive headache with a routed network setup on a Hetzner dedicated server running Proxmox VE 9.2.3. I am running full KVM-based Virtual Machines (VMs), not containers, and I need to assign two separate Failover IPs...