Latest activity
-
Aalpha754293 replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Both of the links that you've provided refers/talks about GlusterFS 11.x. To quote from your first link: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/4028 "This issue did not occur with v10.3" To quote from your second link...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.This has nothing to do with the question whether gluster is dead or not. Debian ships a lot of packages which hasn't seen much or any upstream activity for years as long as somebody volunteers for maintaining it. They also don't ship some...
-
WHi! In more detail, each node's current cpu and memory usage is normalized with its own capacity (i.e. cpu_load = current_cpu / max_cpu and memory_load = current_memory / max_memory), where the node's current load is then a equal-weighted...
-
JJohannes S reacted to guruevi's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with
Like.
Here is actual data from the home lab. constrained to 400Mbps network (more on that later) and tested on 1 system. All systems use the exact same boot image, running Ubuntu provisioned through Vagrant, 1 dedicated drive per node for the servers... -
JJohannes S reacted to spirit's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
@alpha754293 - how many PG do you have on your ceph cluster ? (new pool on empty storage are setting low number of PG by default with target ratio is not configured on the pool, and this can give very low write speed). - do you have enable...
-
Ffabricionaweb replied to the thread Proxmox 6.8.12-9-pve kernel has introduced a problem with e1000e Driver and network connection lost after some hours.Have someone upgraded to a new version? Id like to know if this has been solved or not
-
Aalhaddar posted the thread SR-IOV with Intel X552/82599 vs X710 - Communication issue between VF VM and host bridge in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Hello, I have been testing SR-IOV on two different Proxmox nodes and found a significant difference in behavior between Intel NICs. I would like to share my findings and ask if there is a solution for the X552/82599. --- Hardware Setup: Node...
-
dakralex replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Hi! In more detail, each node's current cpu and memory usage is normalized with its own capacity (i.e. cpu_load = current_cpu / max_cpu and memory_load = current_memory / max_memory), where the node's current load is then a equal-weighted... -
Ppallingerpeter replied to the thread [SOLVED] Use secondary network for PVE commands.Thanks, I will make some exepriments, and post the results if I have something useful.
-
Aalpha754293 replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.What are the specs of the host system? Whch Ubuntu version are you using/running? Why aren't you testing with a Win11 VM as the client? (if you want to mimick an enterprise Win11 VM workload? (unless you don't want to mimick an enterprise Win11...
-
Mmatsba reacted to fschauer's post in the thread Configuring low level LXC options via API with Like.
If you really have to create a container with lxc.* parameters via the API and your use case cannot be solved via the exposed parameters, then yes, cloning a prepared template is the only option I can think of.
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Proxmox / Ceph / Backups & Replica Policy.Wait for 20.2.1 and a fix is shipped within. And yes, you can use said command. Sad that no credits were given for my work here. -
dakralex replied to the thread Conntrack not working when VM has HA turned on.Hi! Yes, this is a known issue and is currently tracked with this Bugzilla entry [0]. [0] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7053
-
dakralex replied to the thread pve‑ha‑lrm segfault on a single HA node.Thanks for the infos! It's a bit unfortunate that the log doesn't have any entries before the error to know on what tasks the LRM was currently working on. Can I assume that the node is the ballpark of ~33+ nodes according to the names? How...
-
JI tried the browser my distro came with (Konqueror) and did not have an issue. In doing so I was reminded of a Vivaldi browser setting that I had recently changed. I found in the Vivaldi settings Privacy and Security section, under Website...
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread EXT4-fs error (device dm-1):.lsblk -o+FSTYPE,LABEL,MODEL Please post the requested info. Were on your Proxmox server are the files you are worried about? Depending on your setup they may be on another filesystem than the one that is currently troubled. After backing up...
-
Ddrpreag reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
AArnOCP replied to the thread All VM can't accessible after kernel UPdate of the nodes?.Here are the boot log of working kernel, i cannot find the not working log ?!?
-
DDaniel Wagner replied to the thread free Starwind x Proxmox SAN storage plugin.+1
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread Changed IPs on my cluster before reading anythings.On pve01; did you copy the corosync config to /etc/pve/corosync.conf as well? Looks like the corosync config is not yet updated on pve02. Did you restart the services or reboot after changing the config? Do not try to fix two nodes at the same...