Latest activity
-
NNicolasM reacted to deebsr's post in the thread [Feature Request] - Remote Migration - Allow re-ID of VM automatically using Target cluster's VMID range with
Like.
I have also added to the Bugzilla page for this feature: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7547 -
NNicolasM reacted to deebsr's post in the thread [Feature Request] - Remote Migration - Allow re-ID of VM automatically using Target cluster's VMID range with Like.
Hello all, When migrating a VM to another remote cluster it would be nice to have a check box or some kind of option to have that VM get its VMID changed to a VMID from the target cluster VMID range. Reason for this is that if we have shared...
-
NNicolasM posted the thread PDM automated installs and LACP bond in Datacenter Manager: Installation and configuration.Hello! I would like to know if more complex networking setup will eventually be supported by PDM automated installs. Every NICs we use is LACP bonded in pair. Ex: one pair for the management, one pair for the intra-cluster traffic and one last...
-
NMich würde interessieren, welche Filterquoten in etwa erreicht werden und an welchen Stellen die Mails hängen bleiben (DNSBL, Spamassassin, Blocklist, ...) Welche Mails machen euch am meisten Probleme? Bei mir sind etwa 50% DNSBL 35%...
-
Pph4zed replied to the thread local backup storage no longer available?.haha I swear I did not do anything fancy to cause the issue. This was my first time installing PBS, so I stuck to the basics as much as possible. My goal was only to use the internal nvme for backing up some smaller VMs, so I took the storage...
-
Llubbe5 posted the thread EXT4-fs error (device dm-1): in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello, I'm really at a loss. Since yesterday, my Proxmox server has crashed, and after a reboot the server is no longer reachable. I can no longer log in through the console either. The only way I can access a console is by booting from the USB...
-
JJohannes S reacted to gasherbrum's post in the thread Server hardware recommendations for new 3–4 node Proxmox VE / Ceph cluster with Like.
certainly, i also used a gold partner in north america and they were able to assist with hardware selection, so you might try reaching out to another one. other comments in the thread also have good advice. On Intel/AMD, the Xeon 6 CPUs can...
-
JJohannes S reacted to unblinded's post in the thread Server hardware recommendations for new 3–4 node Proxmox VE / Ceph cluster with Like.
Thanks for the detailed reply. This definitely raises my confidence around using newer-generation servers for a PVE/Ceph deployment. I had been debating whether the previous generation might be the safer/more mature choice, but you make a good...
-
JJohannes S reacted to gasherbrum's post in the thread Server hardware recommendations for new 3–4 node Proxmox VE / Ceph cluster with Like.
yep its pretty barebones, i quoted both dell and supermicro and dell came in about 50% more for the same hardware, a better IPMI was not worth that amount of money
-
Cchristophe replied to the thread kernel 7.0 performance issue with zfs pools.Hi Drom, Yes, zfs pool, 10 x 12TiB SATA drives. Christophe.
-
DDomino replied to the thread Increase in IO pressure after 9.2.3 update.I just checked all my upgraded nodes, most are less than 0.05% on IO pressure stall, and IO load barely cracks 1%, its at 0% most the time. I'm running Epyc's (rome/milan) and 5950x's, guests are doing average workloads, storage tiers are all...
-
Hi. I believe it should be backup, not proxmox-backup-client. BTW, is your datastore really below /root directory? This is quite unusual. P.S. Mind that /root directory permissions usually don't let other users (like backup user) access... -
Mmvarst replied to the thread [SOLVED] Hung startup sequence.This is my current/old fstab (the one that works): # <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass> # Data Drives LABEL=ZXA1F80V /mnt/data/hdd/24T-ZXA1F80V ext4 defaults 0 2...
-
DDomino replied to the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.1 released!.Indeed, already have alternative layers in place to provide monitoring, but they are an additional myriad of scripts that in all fairness is a lot of extra legwork that could in theory be avoided to make things more streamlined. From an...
-
OOnslow replied to the thread local backup storage no longer available?.Don't mess with /root ;-) Use some new directory like /datastore I don't remember the details how I made mine because I was experimenting a bit and used the CLI. I think it's possible to create a datastore using just the GUI. Or maybe except the...
-
DDomino reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.1 released! with Like.
For this it might make sense to setup a dedicated monitoring software though e.g. Prometheus, Icinga2 or checkmk. pulse is a monitoring software specifically aimed at ProxmoxVE which also publishes it's metrics to prometheus.
-
UdoB reacted to guruevi's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
The problem with Gluster is that a negative lookup has to (worst case scenario) traverse every brick in the cluster and do a DHT search. Gluster metadata operations, particularly for negative lookups and in rebalancing scenarios, can become...
-
UdoB reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
IMO also bit strange discussion, so only two points from my side: 1. Glusterfs really is not KISS, it might be relatively simple to setup for some use cases, especially testing ones, but there stops the simple side of it. If you find it bein EOL...
-
UdoB reacted to guruevi's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
If you want a technical discussion, you need to do it on technical terms. Your benchmarks (like most benchmarks) are invalid because you're not benchmarking the 'same thing'. Moreover, you're benchmarking 1 thing (Windows?) which, if you know...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
This is a logical fallacy. Just because the security issues you linked are not pressent in an older kernel doesn't mean that your old kernel doesn't have any security issues. In fact it defenitifely will have known (and unknown) security issues...