Latest activity
-
SSunilkumar reacted to Colin 't Hart's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with
Like.
Sorry, but *why* is this configuration information being stored outside of /etc ? -
SSunilkumar reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
Sorry! It was right there in my face! Shame on me... This will generate name pinning configuration for the interface 'enp1s0' - continue (y/N)? y Name for link 'enp1s0' (enx525400d99ca2) will change to 'eth0' Generating link files Successfully...
-
SSunilkumar reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
Ah! I see... pve01:/usr/local/lib/systemd/network# cat 50-pve-eth0.link [Match] MACAddress=52:54:00:4b:c1:2b Type=ether [Link] Name=eth0 Thank you
-
SSunilkumar reacted to shanreich's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
They are stored in /usr/local/lib/systemd/network as link files with name 50-pve-<pnined_name>.link
-
SSunilkumar reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
Hi... I am using pve-network-interface-pinning to pin enp1s0, for instance, to eth0, eth1... and so on. I have 9 nic each server. But I need to change the hardware and after that, all nic turns back to previously name, like enp1s0, when I use ip...
-
aaron replied to the thread Gibt es mit PVE 2.x ggf. Änderungen bei der RAM-Nutzung, bzw. deren Anzeige bei VMs?.Balloon Agent von der VirtIO ISO installiert und läuft der auch? -
Ffrankz replied to the thread delete old VM backup 100 but new backup not execute.Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law. You do not have any new mail. Last login: Thu May 28 07:40:18 2026 from 192.168.3.7 root@pbs:~# proxmox-backup-manager version --verbose proxmox-backup...
-
Bbossanova808 reacted to fabian's post in the thread Asymmetric Tailscale speed issue with Kernel 7 and multiple NIC types with Like.
that does look like a potential cherry-pick candidate, yes.
-
RolandK reacted to fabian's post in the thread building pve kernel fails with make[2]: *** [debian/rules:281: abicheck] Fehler 1 with Like.
e the developer documentation applies to all packages, as does the requirement for the devel repository. some packages might build fine without it by chance. it probably doesn't hurt to reference it in the kernel readme as well (since it is... -
YYuri_AR replied to the thread Improving performance of RaidZ1.This would be 3x enterprise drives, in some sort of performance-oriented configuration, while the existing 3 are left for slow/bulk storage. Yeah, it's not ideal, but we needed *some* sort of redundancy. Also, I didn't initially plan to use this...
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread Improving performance of RaidZ1.Yes, MX500 is DRAM cached like the Samsung 870 EVO. But OP has BX500. Compare: https://tweakers.net/pricewatch/compare/1645084;1893356;2078708;1745668/
-
Fflax8334 reacted to fabian's post in the thread Expanded Support for PBS Client (Arm64, Ubuntu) with Like.
the client is available as a static binary that should work on most x86_64 linux distros: https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/installation.html#install-statically-linked-proxmox-backup-client
-
Fflax8334 reacted to fabian's post in the thread Expanded Support for PBS Client (Arm64, Ubuntu) with Like.
there are no official ARM builds at the moment, but it should be possible to build one yourself if you want.
-
Fflax8334 reacted to fabian's post in the thread Expanded Support for PBS Client (Arm64, Ubuntu) with Like.
at the moment, yes, that is vastly more work on our end. but see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-arm64.183752/#post-853847 ;)
-
news replied to the thread Improving performance of RaidZ1.the Crucial MX500 4TB Drive can have DRAM Cache: # https://www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/crucial-mx500-4-tb.d951 -
Ddaanw replied to the thread Improving performance of RaidZ1.Fast enterprise drives are obviously preferred and they usually also have a much higher TBW so they wear out much slower. But they come at a price. It's a trade-off. Invest in enterprise grade hardware which is fast and lasts longer or spend less...
-
Rrevvr posted the thread Is there a definitive guide on SPICE and Nginx Proxy Manager? in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.I'm on 9.2 and I cannot connect to VMs via SPICE when using the domain to connect to PVE. It only works if I get into PVE via IP. I think the issue has to be with NPM, but I haven't found reliable information on how to propery configure PVE 9...
-
Pproxuser77 replied to the thread Easy Way to Automatically Forward Ports to VM's / LXC Containers.But that’s still much better than simply forwarding traffic directly to the relevant apps on port 3000, etc., which suggests to me that many apps likely use plain HTTP or self-signed certificates. An absolute no-go in 2026, and never a good idea...
-
UdoB reacted to Fearless-Grape5584's post in the thread Easy Way to Automatically Forward Ports to VM's / LXC Containers with Like.
If there is no specific reason to keep the CT/LXC behind a Proxmox-internal NATed bridge, I would consider attaching the CT/LXC directly to vmbr0 and giving it an IP address on the same LAN as your Internet router. Then the port forwarding can... -
Rrulezz replied to the thread Allow migration and replication of disks on ZFS encrypted storage.hold on folks, does this mean zfs native encryption is officially supported?