Latest activity

  • J
    Johannes S reacted to UdoB's post in the thread Hardwarer oder Software RAID with Like Like.
    Gern ;-) Du hast vermutlich breitere Erfahrungswerte als ich --> unterschiedliche Empfehlungen sehe ich generell als wertvoll an.
  • H
    h@rald reacted to Jack1967's post in the thread Node maintenance mode UI with Like Like.
    And (temporarily) enabling maintenance mode for a server should be integrated in the shutdown procedures too. Resources defined as HA resources shouldn't be stopped when a server goes down but migrated to another available server the same kind...
  • H
    h@rald reacted to rebootnz's post in the thread Node maintenance mode UI with Like Like.
    Agree this needs to be added to the GUI ASAP so Proxmox can become more mainstream It shouldn't be that hard.
  • H
    h@rald reacted to Siebert_GmbH's post in the thread Node maintenance mode UI with Like Like.
    I miss this Maintenance Mode function in the GUI too. Last year i migrated our VMware and Hyper-V Clusters to Proxmox. The Maintenace mode is one of only Thing i miss. Hoe therer will be a button in the near future.
  • J
    I've just got a reply from Veeam support: I 'm a bit astonished that 9.2.x is still not supported by Veeam. However, I updated the plugin (one needs to uninstall the current one before) and will try if that fixes the problem. I will let you know!
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to fabian's post in the thread Slow forums? with Like Like.
    like I said - this is a global problem the last few months (well, a bit longer now already I guess). anything with dynamic content that basically allows endless possibilities to query (like git forges, forums, ...) are hit particularly hard...
  • shanreich
    You can leak into the default routing table via the Exit Node parameter, but currently not between EVPN VRFs.
  • K
    Does this mean that route leaking between EVPN VRFs is still not possible via the Proxmox VE 9.2 GUI?
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to fabian's post in the thread Deduplication question with Like Like.
    the behaviour is intentional and a security feature - each newly created snapshot is only allowed to re-use chunks of the previous snapshot, for other chunks it has to "prove" that it actually has that chunk by uploading it. PBS (as opposed to...
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to fabian's post in the thread New Secure Boot shim on Proxmox Host? with Like Like.
    updated shims for Trixie-based products are now rolled out, they are signed with both old and new microsoft certificates/keys.
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to shanreich's post in the thread SDN, IPAM & DHCP with Like Like.
    Yes, that is to be expected, the IPAM tab in Datacenter is what you pick when you choose `pve` as the IPAM option, otherwise the external plugin is used. What's the exact sdn config? cat /etc/pve/sdn/zones.cfg cat /etc/pve/sdn/vnets.cfg cat...
  • O
    Thanks for the reply! I admit I hadn't investigated the agent due to it working with no errors for years... root@redacted[~]# qemu-ga -V QEMU Guest Agent 5.0.1 root@redacted[~]# qemu-ga -D [general] daemon=false method=isa-serial...
  • O
    Thanks for the reply! I admit I hadn't investigated the agent due to it working with no errors for years... root@redacted[~]# qemu-ga -V QEMU Guest Agent 5.0.1 root@redacted[~]# qemu-ga -D [general] daemon=false method=isa-serial...
  • cwt
    cwt replied to the thread Hardwarer oder Software RAID.
    Die 5. HDD kannst Du als Reserve drin lassen und einen striped mirror aus den 4 Stück erstellen. RAIDZ/5/6 (parity) ist für VM Performance generell die schlechteste Wahl.
  • G
    Hallo geordi, leider gibt es keinen offiziellen Weg die Weboberfläche hier anzupassen. Du könntest CSS overrides über deinen Browser probieren, allerdings kann dies bei einem Update leicht kaputt gehen und andere unvorhersehbare Verhaltensweisen...
  • R
    I can confirm similar behavior on a 4-node cluster running Proxmox VE 9.2.2. Cluster hardware: 2x Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 1x AMD EPYC 7551P 1x AMD EPYC 3251 Only the EPYC 3251 node is affected. Symptoms: Progressive performance degradation...
  • H
    I can confirm similar behavior on a 4-node cluster running Proxmox VE 9.2.2. Cluster hardware: 2x Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 1x AMD EPYC 7551P 1x AMD EPYC 3251 Only the EPYC 3251 node is affected. Symptoms: Progressive performance degradation...
    • 1779790248316.png
  • F
    Hi, I can't recall the actual message that prompted me to reapply the SDN config. I can remember it was show under SDN/Status for all my VLANs/VNets, while the Fabric just was showing the usual "ok". Also there was no error message during the...
  • Moayad
    Hi, Thank you for sharing the soltuion. For your informaiton I set your thread as [SOLVED] to help other people who have the same issue.
  • ggoller
    Hi, I wasn't able to reproduce this on my cluster. A few questions from my side: How did this look in the UI? Did you get an error on apply? Where there any pending changes? We didn't deprecate anything in the fabrics yet AFAIK. You could try...