Latest activity
-
JJohannes S reacted to floppymaster-br's post in the thread Who runs Proxmox on the oldest hardware ? with
Like.
Hey man, as today, i'm running one of this in my homelab (3 node cluster)! Yesterday i update to pve9 - i'm happy with this ultra-low energy choice. BTW, works for me too! ;) -
JJohannes S reacted to Dunuin's post in the thread Who runs Proxmox on the oldest hardware ? with Like.
I think Intel Xeons E3/E5 v2 to v4 are the best bang for the buck right now on the used hardware market and PVE 7.2 works fine on them. But they are also "only" 6-9 years old. Also, read here people were running PVE on Xeon W/X/E CPUs which...
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread [SOLVED] kernel update fail 6.14 to 7.0 no space left on device.If you somehow have more kernels installed than your EFI can hold, apt purge unfortunately doesn't finish because the post.rm script tries to setup the remaining kernels. The solution is to manually remove old vmlinuz* / initrd.img* from the EFI...
-
MMaurice Janssen posted the thread Proxmox with nfs 4.1 on Netapp All Flash in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi, Witch nfs config is the best for proxmox with a netapp All flash systym, Pnfs or session trunking ? And are there any other performance settings ?In the documentation is netapp not clear about this configuration.
-
CCurt Hall reacted to rfournier's post in the thread Windows Server 2025 won't boot on AMD EPYC with Like.
Thank you both for your replies! I did try the flags=-nested-virt but it didn't help. Regarding kernel and qemu versions, I've downgraded from kernel 7 to 6.17 -> VM not booting Downgraded pve-qemu-vm from 11 to 10 -> still not booting I just...
-
Aalexkenon replied to the thread Windows VirtIO Drivers Upgrade (error).I'm installing 0.1.271 because it's 100% stable. Actually, the question is, is there a way to make it happen for many years in a row: just install a new version on top and everything is updated? If not, then maybe someone has found an option...
-
Aalexkenon reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread Windows VirtIO Drivers Upgrade (error) with Like.
Not sure why you would need to update the drivers on a working (?) system, all the time. There is a newer 0.1.285 version available. I believe this matches your experience. Maybe see here also.
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Way more NAGware, very little functionality, bugs galore.Pulling a case of Godwins law won't make me take you more seriously. In the case of Proxmox it's quite laughable since they have a decades old track record of NOT outselling. One Proxmox developer ( I think @t.lamprecht but I might be wrong)...
-
Ffrankz replied to the thread Kernel error after pihole update.Hello Fabian before doing other tests I installed a minimal debian , installed pihole and then amount with teleporter the configuration . here is the status of the services compared to lxc with a vm : oot@192.168.3.199's password: Linux piholeVM...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Way more NAGware, very little functionality, bugs galore.Yes, otherwise I wouldn't have used it ;) Correct, I'm also not paying for Proxmox. But I also don't expect developers to give freebies to me. I'm trying to help in other terms, e.g. by participating in the forum or being a free beta tester ;)...
-
Fflames reacted to news's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
Please don't write in Bold and Black! It's horrible to read with a black screen config.
-
Ccyp replied to the thread [SOLVED] kernel update fail 6.14 to 7.0 no space left on device.It's a recurrent problem, I use the following command to get rid of old kernel dpkg -l 'proxmox-kernel-*.*.*' | sed '/^ii/!d;/'"$(uname -r | sed "s/\(.*\)-\([^0-9]\+\)/\1/")"'/d;s/^[^ ]* [^ ]* \([^ ]*\).*/\1/;/[0-9]/!d' | xargs sudo apt -y purge
-
Ccd-jbo posted the thread GUI, Input syntax for "TLS Destination Policy" doesn't match the postfix syntax in Mail Gateway: Installation and configuration.Format [smtp.domain.dev]:25 secure cant be entered in /etc/pmg/tls_policy via the GUI. Probably due to a format check. Destination: [smtp.domain.dev]:25 Policy: secure Gives error: Parameter verification failed. (400) destination: invalid...
-
Fflames reacted to UdoB's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
You did not say anything of the underlying filesystems...? For ZFS it may be expected as ZFS does a lot more work than classic filesystems under the hood, resulting in multiple IO-operations used for metadata etc...
-
FFingerlessGloves replied to the thread Broadcom BCM57504 - VLAN issues over Bond.Hi Shanreich, It's the issue was a mixure of two issues, the cards and the Mikrotik Switches. On Proxmox I have to do add a postup for the vlan offload, otherwise I've found sometimes the VLANs on a bridge don't work at all, it's not very...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Way more NAGware, very little functionality, bugs galore.For an "overall system overview" I still think that people should use a dedicated monitoring plattform. I really don't want to have another dashboard to monitor but alerting on critical state and a general overview no matther wheter it's a vm, a...
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread I need help for setting up backup solution.I assume you have your main unit on 24/7 and turn on the backup unit manually from time to time to do backups of the main unit? PBS has a lot of benefits for backing up and restoring VMs/LXCs over your current local backups. This is even already...
-
Ffloppymaster-br replied to the thread Who runs Proxmox on the oldest hardware ?.Hey man, as today, i'm running one of this in my homelab (3 node cluster)! Yesterday i update to pve9 - i'm happy with this ultra-low energy choice. BTW, works for me too! ;)
-
JJohannes S reacted to meyergru's post in the thread Way more NAGware, very little functionality, bugs galore with Like.
I do not think the argument was fired against a "supposed freeloader" (I am one, too), however let's be realistic: The concerns against PDM that you expressed boil down to two points: 1. PDM is not yet ripe enough. Granted. 2. PDM nags you more...
-
IIsThisThingOn replied to the thread PBS testimonial (hardware requirements are a joke).To be more precise: L2ARC is not optimized for read workloads. It is an added read cache that caches stuff that evicted ARC before. It does only do read cache, never write cache. Not sure if I would agree with that statement. I have not run...