Latest activity
-
Ddaanw replied to the thread [solved] pve 8 to 9 fail.These are Linux kernel versions, not Proxmox versions. So you are booting your updated Proxmox 9 with Linux kernel 7.0.2-6-pve. At the end of the existing kernel command line, append systemd.unit=rescue.target or systemd.unit=emergency.target...
-
MI think the OP is talking about MailGateway (not sure since his post doesn't say much about what he actually wants to achieve) not PVE. The recommendation is the same though: https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#chapter_pmgupgrade
-
HHammyHavoc replied to the thread Proxmox host and VM both failing large HTTPS downloads with Bad Record MAC / TLS decryption errors.Have you tried it on PVE 6.x? I'm having issues with an e1000e NIC not working under 7.x on a single node. Port doesn't even light up, but works fine when I boot into 6.x.
-
fba replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.Thanks for clarification. I had around 20 single servers updated yesterday at different times and seeing a different menu only on one of them, was a bit confusing. -
KKingneutron reacted to THE_BIG_ONE's post in the thread Q35 v11.0 causes extreme corruption on many VMs Linux/BSD/Windows (STOP 0x8007025d) with
Like.
I've finally narrowed down the exact settings / what is causing the issue. I've been repeating installs on 4 different proxmox host machines over and over changing one thing at a time and comparing. It's the SSD and Discard flag being set... -
fba replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.The Roadmap states I did see this Datacenter → Guest Resources/Hardware on a PVE 9.1.19 yesterday evening, but not today anymore on a PVE 9.2.2. The menu is flat again without Guest Resources/Hardware. What am I missing?
-
KKingneutron reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
Happy to report that we have successfully run our storage-oriented CI/CD workflows against PVE 9.2, and no issues were uncovered during the initial test runs. Congratulations again on a solid release. Sincerely, Blockbridge Blockbridge ...
-
Rromek92 replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.Kernel: 7.0.2-6-pve HW CPU: AMD GX-424CC I am experiencing very high CPU usage after a kernel update. There is a huge overhead in CPU usage in SY time. perf output: + 41.10% 0.05% [kernel] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe + 41.05% 0.10%...
-
LLe_Coyote replied to the thread LXC: cannot mount /run inside guest after PVE 8 to 9 upgrade (was: loopback interface not coming up).Thank you, much appreciated!
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Useful Tips.I think the OP is talking about MailGateway (not sure since his post doesn't say much about what he actually wants to achieve) not PVE. The recommendation is the same though: https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#chapter_pmgupgrade
-
HHenris reacted to Weissnix4711's post in the thread [SOLVED] How to do DNAT with SDN custom rule on Single host? with Like.
Sorry to bump an old thread, but have there been any developments re. DNAT in proxmox-firewall? Is there a roadmap or feature tracker somewhere?
-
PToday, I upgraded my pve from 8 to 9. This is a basic pve (36 cores, 64GB ram) that runs 4 pct. Ran the pve8to9 test, all good. All containers stopped. Changed bookworm to trixie on sources and pve-no-sub. apt update, then apt dist-upgrade...
-
-
JJohannes S reacted to waltar's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
What would be the sentense of a "filesystem cache" ? It caches the filesystem and so hide I/O requests to the underlaying disks. So as the cache for read and write is mostly always better as the more far I/O path instead of just to memory ideal...
-
JWürde ich nie kaufen. Dafür dass die "leer" sind und halt doch nicht richtig erweitert werden können, sind die mir zu teuer. Der kleinste kostet leer 440 Euro. Wenn ich 100 Euro für Netzteil und Gehäuse rechne (das geht...), dann habe ich 340...
-
JIch würde mir einen 19" Einschub wünschen, in dem diverse unterschiedliche Mini-PCs vertikal arretiert werden könnten und per Gleitschiene komplett ausgezogen werden könnten. So ähnlich wie damals die Bladeserver von IBM, nur eben in modern. So...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors.I actually doubt this. Most users on reddit maybe, but I doubt that the largest part of Proxmox revenue (which actually funds the development) comes from homelabbers instead of companys ditching Vmware
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
hmm. yes, I see your point. I am guilty of thinking of PVE as an infrastructure. I forget that many (most?) of its users are homelabbers. consider me chastised :)
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors with Like.
True generally, untrue in the OPs testing matrix. LVM-thin introduces its own problems. Since it is of almost no benefit in a modern deployment (LVM thick for SAN, zfs/btrfs for local) I dont know why OP even bothered testing it.
-
AHi, I have defined this mountpoint. /mnt/pve/containers is a NFS mount mp0: /mnt/pve/containers/media/immich,mp=/opt/immich/upload,idmap=u:999:1026:1;g:991:100:1 and when I try to start the container I get the following error DEBUG utils -...
-
LLongQT-sea replied to the thread Mac OS Tahoe and remote sessions on Proxmox without GPU.Chrome Remote Desktop is working fine.
