Latest activity

What's new Featured content New posts New profile posts Latest activity
  • T
    TErxleben replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).
    Ist in meinen Augen auch die vernünftigste Lösung. Allerdings hast du den ZFS-Overhead in jeder VM und jedem Container. In VMs, in denen explizit ZFS angelegt wird, sogar doppelt. Darum habe ich bei ZFS immer noch leichte Bauchschmerzen. Kann...
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to cwt's post in the thread Fragen zu LVM SSD-Cache with Like Like.
    Randnotiz: welcher Hoster es auch wird bzw. sein soll - für Mailcow als vollwertige Groupware mit SMTP sollte man darauf achten, saubere IPs zu bekommen.
  • J
    Johannes S replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).
    Nein, ich nutze im Host bereits zfs. Ok, so macht es Sinn, danke ;) Müsste man da nicht sogar mit keepalived oder carp ( für opnsense ) die Minute wegoptimieren können?
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to Rainerle's post in the thread nfs error in lxc with Like Like.
    nfs-ganesha runs in user space, so if it hangs or crashes in the CT (LXC) container it will not take the Proxmox Host down with it. If the nfs-kernel-server in a CT container has problems it might hang the Proxmox host. It is better to run a...
  • T
    TErxleben replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).
    Sozusagen ZFS innerhalb eines Containers auf ext4 Basis des PVE? Tun sie ja nicht. Zwei physische GWs. Zwei OpenWRTs mit gleicher IP, die nie gleichzeitig aktiv sind, und nur auf unterschiedlich GWs verweisen. Fällt der StandardWRT aus, wird die...
  • cwt
    cwt replied to the thread Fragen zu LVM SSD-Cache.
    Randnotiz: welcher Hoster es auch wird bzw. sein soll - für Mailcow als vollwertige Groupware mit SMTP sollte man darauf achten, saubere IPs zu bekommen.
  • M
    MrPete replied to the thread 2026 Guide: Samba + Native ZFS Windows ACLs in an Unprivileged Proxmox LXC.
    Part 2: 5. Streamlined smb.conf Architecture Open /etc/samba/smb.conf inside the container. By exploiting Samba's internal macro overrides (where ignore system acls = yes automatically presets store dos attributes = yes, sets all map options to...
  • A
    alexskysilk replied to the thread Installing proxmox on UCS C220 M3.
    for the purposes of this conversation, disk passthrough and jbod is the same thing. and yes, you can and should use it. As for "best way," it really depends on what you want your "nas" to actually do. I am never a fan or running storage that is...
  • M
    MrPete posted the thread 2026 Guide: Samba + Native ZFS Windows ACLs in an Unprivileged Proxmox LXC in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.
    Part 1 - too long to fit in one post. A Definitive Guide: High-Performance Samba + Native ZFS Windows ACLs in an Unprivileged Proxmox LXC This blueprint configures: a standalone Samba file server running inside an unprivileged Proxmox LXC...
  • J
    Johannes S reacted to Mig74's post in the thread Planing the right Backup Environment with Like Like.
    This is historically, in the Past i was running my Unify-Controller as container on it, but since that became bigger and more powerfull i decided to reinstall it as VM on one of the bigger nodes. About my cluster, the 2 bigger nodes have 4 NICs...
  • J
    Johannes S replied to the thread Planing the right Backup Environment.
    Then use it only as qdevice to save you potential issues with the corosync network. The qdecice can be a small vm or lxc, so this is what I would do for maximum seperation. Alternatively reinstall the system as plain Debian and setup the qdevice...
  • M
    mn234 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?) with Like Like.
    the Ceph stack provided by PVE is designed for use in a PVE hypervisor environment; I totally get the desire to comingle cephfs and rbd but in this specific case your choice is comingle and use your own SMB bridgeheads, or deploy a standard ceph...
  • M
    mn234 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?) with Like Like.
    thats a smb bridgehead :) although I would use a VM for the purpose instead. and yes, you can mount cephfs inside a vm.
  • J
    Johannes S replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).
    Da gelten halt die gleichen Einwände wie bei TrueNAS. Ich nehme halt einen LXC, weil ich darüber ZFS auf Proxmox-Ebene für die Verwaltung nutzen kann und die Datasets dann an den samba-Server durchreichen. Und beide können das gleiche Modem...
  • A
    alexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?).
    thats a smb bridgehead :) although I would use a VM for the purpose instead. and yes, you can mount cephfs inside a vm.
  • M
    Mig74 replied to the thread Planing the right Backup Environment.
    This is historically, in the Past i was running my Unify-Controller as container on it, but since that became bigger and more powerfull i decided to reinstall it as VM on one of the bigger nodes. About my cluster, the 2 bigger nodes have 4 NICs...
    • 1778946472352.png
  • M
    mn234 replied to the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?).
    Thanks for letting me know. I actually found a funny workaround. I installed samba on the same host and used /localhost/share and point to the cephfs-fuse directory. It's an odd duck but it works.
  • A
    alexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?).
    the Ceph stack provided by PVE is designed for use in a PVE hypervisor environment; I totally get the desire to comingle cephfs and rbd but in this specific case your choice is comingle and use your own SMB bridgeheads, or deploy a standard ceph...
  • M
    meyergru reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba) with Like Like.
    Das Problem ist halt, dass viele Leute sich so Sachen wie TrueNAS, UnRaid oder OMV als VM aufsetzen, weil sie halt gerne eine GUI für das Einrichten ihrer Netzwerkfreigaben haben wollen, diese Systeme aber eigentlich davon ausgehen und erwarten...
  • T
    TErxleben replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).
    Da frage ich mich immer warum? Performancegewinn auf Kosten von viel schwererer Kapselung? Wenn ich das letzte Yota Performance brauche, bleibt nur Baremetal. Dann will ich Netzwerkverkehr aber schon mal aussen vor lassen. Minimalistischer geht...
Show older items
Top Bottom
Back