Latest activity
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Installing proxmox on UCS C220 M3.for the purposes of this conversation, disk passthrough and jbod is the same thing. and yes, you can and should use it. As for "best way," it really depends on what you want your "nas" to actually do. I am never a fan or running storage that is...
-
MMrPete posted the thread 2026 Guide: Samba + Native ZFS Windows ACLs in an Unprivileged Proxmox LXC in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Part 1 - too long to fit in one post. A Definitive Guide: High-Performance Samba + Native ZFS Windows ACLs in an Unprivileged Proxmox LXC This blueprint configures: a standalone Samba file server running inside an unprivileged Proxmox LXC...
-
JThis is historically, in the Past i was running my Unify-Controller as container on it, but since that became bigger and more powerfull i decided to reinstall it as VM on one of the bigger nodes. About my cluster, the 2 bigger nodes have 4 NICs...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Planing the right Backup Environment.Then use it only as qdevice to save you potential issues with the corosync network. The qdecice can be a small vm or lxc, so this is what I would do for maximum seperation. Alternatively reinstall the system as plain Debian and setup the qdevice...
-
Mthe Ceph stack provided by PVE is designed for use in a PVE hypervisor environment; I totally get the desire to comingle cephfs and rbd but in this specific case your choice is comingle and use your own SMB bridgeheads, or deploy a standard ceph...
-
Mthats a smb bridgehead :) although I would use a VM for the purpose instead. and yes, you can mount cephfs inside a vm.
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).Da gelten halt die gleichen Einwände wie bei TrueNAS. Ich nehme halt einen LXC, weil ich darüber ZFS auf Proxmox-Ebene für die Verwaltung nutzen kann und die Datasets dann an den samba-Server durchreichen. Und beide können das gleiche Modem...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?).thats a smb bridgehead :) although I would use a VM for the purpose instead. and yes, you can mount cephfs inside a vm.
-
MMig74 replied to the thread Planing the right Backup Environment.This is historically, in the Past i was running my Unify-Controller as container on it, but since that became bigger and more powerfull i decided to reinstall it as VM on one of the bigger nodes. About my cluster, the 2 bigger nodes have 4 NICs...
-
-
Mmn234 replied to the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?).Thanks for letting me know. I actually found a funny workaround. I installed samba on the same host and used /localhost/share and point to the cephfs-fuse directory. It's an odd duck but it works.
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?).the Ceph stack provided by PVE is designed for use in a PVE hypervisor environment; I totally get the desire to comingle cephfs and rbd but in this specific case your choice is comingle and use your own SMB bridgeheads, or deploy a standard ceph...
-
MDas Problem ist halt, dass viele Leute sich so Sachen wie TrueNAS, UnRaid oder OMV als VM aufsetzen, weil sie halt gerne eine GUI für das Einrichten ihrer Netzwerkfreigaben haben wollen, diese Systeme aber eigentlich davon ausgehen und erwarten...
-
TTErxleben replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).Da frage ich mich immer warum? Performancegewinn auf Kosten von viel schwererer Kapselung? Wenn ich das letzte Yota Performance brauche, bleibt nur Baremetal. Dann will ich Netzwerkverkehr aber schon mal aussen vor lassen. Minimalistischer geht...
-
Mmn234 posted the thread [SOLVED] CephFS over SMB (SMB Module?) in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.I need to share cephfs over SMB/CIFS when using Proxmox's built-in ceph management. Ceph has a SMB module, but reading the docs leads me to believe it uses ceph orchestration to manage so it may not work with Proxmox's management. Anyone have...
-
Eegeekial reacted to crazywolf13's post in the thread [SOLVED] NVIDIA 580.x + Kernel 7.0 incompatibility on Trixie with
Like.
Thanks! But driver 550.x which is available via debian repo is too far outdated for me. But maybe some parts of the patches are helpful, I'll take a look, appreciate the link! -
OI see some problems with option 1, so I would go with option 2, more on this later :) If you only use it for quorum I wouldn't add it to the cluster but instead seperate it and use it as a combined ProxmoxBackupServer/qdevice. This also saves...
-
Ccrazywolf13 replied to the thread [SOLVED] NVIDIA 580.x + Kernel 7.0 incompatibility on Trixie.Thanks! But driver 550.x which is available via debian repo is too far outdated for me. But maybe some parts of the patches are helpful, I'll take a look, appreciate the link!
-
Ccrazywolf13 reacted to egeekial's post in the thread [SOLVED] NVIDIA 580.x + Kernel 7.0 incompatibility on Trixie with Like.
I ran into a similar issue with the Debian-packaged 550 driver rather than 580. I put together my patch approach here in case it helps anyone else: https://github.com/egeekial/nvidia-550xx-dkms-proxmox It’s specifically for `nvidia-current`...
-
Eegeekial replied to the thread [SOLVED] NVIDIA 580.x + Kernel 7.0 incompatibility on Trixie.I ran into a similar issue with the Debian-packaged 550 driver rather than 580. I put together my patch approach here in case it helps anyone else: https://github.com/egeekial/nvidia-550xx-dkms-proxmox It’s specifically for `nvidia-current`...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Bester Weg für Fileserver (samba).Das Problem ist halt, dass viele Leute sich so Sachen wie TrueNAS, UnRaid oder OMV als VM aufsetzen, weil sie halt gerne eine GUI für das Einrichten ihrer Netzwerkfreigaben haben wollen, diese Systeme aber eigentlich davon ausgehen und erwarten...
