Yes. Starting with RHEL 10 / AlmaLinux 10, at least the x86-64-v3 microarchitecture is required. Your Intel Xeon E5-2670 only satisfies x86-64-v2 requirements.
Verifying in a VM with a virtual x86-64-v2 processor running Proxmox VE:
# pct mount...
It probably does - however I'll be surprised if this is the explanation to the problems you have shown. As I've pointed out above I do have Tailscale advertised subnet routes on my NW.
@garfield2008
habe die VM jetzt gestoppt mit shutdown und wieder gestartet.
-> selbe Warnung im Log.
Was mit noch aufgefallen ist bei der Durchsicht des Log.
Ist das das Zertifikate das importiert werden soll? Wenn ja, scheint es bereits...
I will but the server is in active use so will need to pick my moment. I wonder if being on the one machine alters the network path somehow, and thus the results. I'll be back!
I will but the server is in active use so will need to pick my moment. I wonder if being on the one machine alters the network path somehow, and thus the results. I'll be back!
They are - & I guess this does enhance the speeds quoted, but I'd be surprised if that was all the difference.
Maybe you do a similar local test & compare the results. (I don't currently have a remote Tailscale node available for iperf testing).
Hallo zusammen,
Ich habe 3 Nodes mit Hilfe von dist-upgrade nach Anleitung von 8 auf 9 hochgezogen und einen 4ten Node direkt mit der 9er Version neu installiert.
Auf allen Nodes ist ein ZFS Pool angelegt und diverse Replizierungen...
Well, it seems you already rebooted another time, since the log starts at May 05, so you need to replace the -1 in the command with the number of boots since the issue.
Not sure if related to the other issue, but in the log I can see:
May 07...
@bossanova808 @Gnosh
I finally got round to testing Tailscale iperf3 speeds on my current 7.0.2-2-pve kernel.
I'm using 2 LXCs on Alpine Linux & I see no problem. (I do have advertised subnet routes on my NW so this will probably enhance the...
Just for reference, I opened a Bugzilla entry for this [0] with a reference to this forum post to not loose track of this.
[0] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7567
can you please post the complete journal output from the last boot (journalctl -b) ? maybe we can see more what might be an issue?
i have an arc pro b50 here in my workstation and after updating the firmware it works fine
Hi,
please share the system journal from the problematic boot. What output do you get when you run the following commands?
systemd-tmpfiles --dry-run --create 2>&1 | grep pve
systemd-tmpfiles --cat-config | grep pve
pveversion -v
As so often: it depends.
If I run a company and I my services infrastructure is used in my office to make money and I want that to be possible with ~99.9 percent reliability (that's one workday per year) then I use the better tested...
Well, it seems you already rebooted another time, since the log starts at May 05, so you need to replace the -1 in the command with the number of boots since the issue.
Not sure if related to the other issue, but in the log I can see:
May 07...
It's not a license (which is a legally very different thing) but a (support) subscription. The no-subscription repository is a little less time-tested and gets features and bugfixes sooner and more often. If there is a problem then it's usually...
erm theres a command in the intel documentation which goes over this
https://github.com/intel/ethernet-linux-i40e
Enabling a VF link if the port is disconnected
----------------------------------------------
If the physical function (PF) link...