Latest activity
-
Mmuddyheadlamp replied to the thread How to setup a Proxmox User with restricted access to only one node.Sorry to resurrect this dead thread, but I have exactly the same question and the link in the reply just goes to this thread.
-
Aalma21 reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Supported way for a NAS across multiple nodes that supports thin disks, snapshots, live migrations, move disks, and HA? with
Like.
Do you mean the qcow feature introduced in PVE9? It's limited to snapshots (although main developer @spirit mentioned at some point that in theory this might also be a possible way to implement thin provisioning, but afik nothing happened since... -
WBecause I was not aware of the bugzilla. In a corporate environment there is frequently a disjoint between placing the order for things like software subscriptions and getting information back from the supplier. All I got was an email with my...
-
JJohannes S reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Clean install Connection error - not loading WEB GUI with Like.
I understand. Still, it doesn't make you safe. Every few weeks there are news described another successful backdoor attack. Also in software used by thousands or millions of people. A notable example is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor
-
JJohannes S reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Clean install Connection error - not loading WEB GUI with Like.
That I don't know. Anyway, I can see that your setup isn't quite basic. As you are - in your own words - "totally new with Proxmox", I suggest you start with a very basic, simple setup and gradually add features and services. Then you'll be able...
-
JI once watched a video of the guy who programmed that first hardware change detection algorithm for microsoft. At least back then, it collected a lot of data about the host. These were weighted and then there was a threshold. And when exceeding...
-
JFor anyone that comes across this post, I cloned a Windows VM to try some new machine settings to improve performance. All went well, until a few days later, it showed it wasn't activated. I have a retail license, but it wouldn't activate...
-
Jhttps://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs-8/pve-admin-guide.html#sysboot_kernel_pin
-
JJohannes S reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
But for the poster's use-case of causing the new pve-qemu-kvm version to be applied/implemented, wouldn't hibernate/resume (or from CLI using qm suspend <vmid> --todisk 1 & then qm resume <vmid> ) not already accomplish this?
-
JJohannes S reacted to gfngfn256's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
When you migrate the VM to another node, the new node is freshly starting the kvm instance (with the new pve-qemu-kvm version) - in fact it is also freshly "booting" the VM - as if it were just now booting - just the state (incl. RAM) has been...
-
JJohannes S reacted to fiona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Yes, it's possible, but not yet Implemented in Proxmox VE: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3303
-
JJohannes S reacted to fiona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Yes, this is an alternative for now.
-
SStefan1507 replied to the thread Problems with PCIe passthrough with two identical devices.I hereby confirm that with the Linux kernel 7.0.0-3-pve, passthrough of both SATA controllers on the DXP8800 Plus works without any issues.
-
VVictor_root posted the thread [FEATURE REQUEST] Middle-click Console to open in a new browser tab (VM, LXC, Shell) in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hi,Hi, I would like to request a small but very useful Web UI improvement for Proxmox VE. Current behavior: - The main "Console" button opens the console using the current/default viewer behavior - xterm.js and noVNC are typically opened in a...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Supported way for a NAS across multiple nodes that supports thin disks, snapshots, live migrations, move disks, and HA?.Do you mean the qcow feature introduced in PVE9? It's limited to snapshots (although main developer @spirit mentioned at some point that in theory this might also be a possible way to implement thin provisioning, but afik nothing happened since...
-
Mmikeely replied to the thread Proxmox Backup Server 4.2 released!.I was specifically talking about S3 immutability specifically, which you did not address. To your point, if an attacker is in backend systems long enough to modify the retention policy in Veeam, wait for the retention to expire, and then delete...
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription.I would highly recommend to do this AFTER the upgrade if at all since the upgrade procedure wasn' tested to work with apt pinning (see also https://wiki.debian.org/AptConfiguration and https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian ). It's also not...
-
JJohannes S reacted to justinclift's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available on test and no-subscription with Like.
You can move back to the prior kernel (and keep on kernel 6.x) by doing this (this is from memory though, so be careful with it): 1. Create the APT preferences file (/etc/apt/preferences.d/proxmox-default-kernel) which instructs apt to keep on...
-
Bboisbleu replied to the thread nicht vergessen: UEFI-Zertifikate Eurer EFI-Disk Instanzen 06.2026!.Gute Frage. Vermutlich wenn EFI Disk und TPM vorhanden sind. Wobei SecureBoot ja nur funktioniert, wenn die Keys ausgerollt werden. Also müsste man mit dem pre-enrolled-keys=1 weiterkommen. Vielleicht weiß jemand anderes, ob es da eine elegante...
-
Aalma21 replied to the thread Supported way for a NAS across multiple nodes that supports thin disks, snapshots, live migrations, move disks, and HA?.Hi, beside the thin layer (for VM disks & snapshots) the listed features are already available on PVE shared LVM and if your SAN supports thin provisioning the thick volume issue should not be a showstopper ... I have also read somewhere in the...