Update:
Since I can not pass the motherboard attached SATA controller to ProxMox (as ProxMox itself is running of Motherboard SATA controller) I tried to pass through the separate ASM1061 controller and successfully created the Pass Through...
Generell, wenn ein neuer Kernel mal Probleme macht, kann man einen älteren als Default Boot Option pinnen:
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#sysboot_kernel_pin
Um die aktuellen anzusehen: proxmox-boot-tool kernel list
Danke, ja das hab ich bereits getan.
Aber schöner wäre ja wenn ich entweder den neuen Kernel zum laufen bekomme oder aber wenigstens deinstallieren könnte. Jedoch sagt er, beim Versuch ihn zu deinstallieren, dass er nicht installiert ist und...
We're pleased to announce the release of Proxmox Backup Server 4.2.
This version is based on Debian 13.4 ("Trixie"), uses Linux kernel 7.0 as the new stable default for improved hardware support, and comes with ZFS 2.4 for reliable...
@blueman wie sieht denn dein ZFS Pool aus?
zpool status
zpool list -v
Bei HDDs Ich hoffe 7.200 RPM NAS Drives mit CMR Speichermethode.
Evtl. ein Rad10 ähnliches Setup mit 4x HDDs?
Wurde dem ZFS Pool noch SSDs als ZFS Special Device mit mind...
Warum überhaupt OMV? Wenn es dir um eine GUI für Dateifreigaben gibt, dafür tut es dann auch eine Debian-VM mit Webmin oder Cockpit. Oder ein lxc-Container mit den turnkey-fileserver o.ä, etwa https://github.com/bashclub/zamba-lxc-toolbox...
Hi everyone! I need to get user_xattr as a mount option on my LXC container with Samba, currently I have ACLs activated, but I see only this when I fetch the attributes:
root@fileserver /srv/storage# findmnt /srv/storage
TARGET SOURCE...
I contacted Minisforum support, they directed me to adjust BIOS like written in readme file attached to 1.27 version.
After adjusting bios, it works reliably. I tested also the performance diff, and it is the same.
Hello @katamadone,
Have you found a solution? Or any clues or conclusions? Anything that might point to the cause or reason?
I'm still running tests and trying to find the root cause to fix it, but I haven't had any luck yet :(
Hi!
Unfortunately, this is a bug, which was introduced in pve-ha-manager 5.1.2, but is fixed for the current pve-ha-manager 5.2.0, which is on the pve-test and pve-no-subscription repositories.
If you currently cannot update to this package...
Thanks for the feedback!
We also thought about including more terms to the "cost function" of a migration, though we mainly focused on the core feature first.
The current load balancing implementation focuses on reducing the imbalance between...
Moin, und wie immer gilt: nur wenn man es selber macht, hat man etwas gelernt. Sonst versucht man sich an einem Serverbetriebssystem ohne das passende wissen und versucht hier irgendeine Funktion herauszupressen! Also gib dir mal ein Jahr und...
Generell, wenn ein neuer Kernel mal Probleme macht, kann man einen älteren als Default Boot Option pinnen:
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#sysboot_kernel_pin
Um die aktuellen anzusehen: proxmox-boot-tool kernel list
Hi!
Recent security fixes in the pve-manager package forced us to ship this package earlier to all repositories (including the enterprise repository), which already contain the settings for the load balancer in the web interface. Though the load...
Mal googeln, das Forum hier durchschauen, das Thema wird hier des Öfteren immer mal wieder behandelt, insbesondere im Bezug auf die Helper scripte.
Aber mit der Netzwerkkarte hat es nichts zu tun, eher an den Einstellungen.
Ob der knallt wenn...
Yes, good idea! We already thought about this during development, though we were focusing on the core feature first. Feel free to create a Bugzilla entry [0] for this in the mean time, though as this is relatively trivial to implement and as you...
Yes, some recent security fixes for the pve-manager package forced us to ship the package, which already includes the load balancer options in the web interface, earlier to all repositories, while we're still waiting to move pve-ha-manager 5.2.0...
Yes, good idea! We already thought about this during development, though we were focusing on the core feature first. Feel free to create a Bugzilla entry [0] for this in the mean time, though as this is relatively trivial to implement and as you...