Latest activity
-
Ggfngfn256 replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.Have not really noticed that - if anything maybe 1-2 watts LOWER power draw on the newer kernel. Really to early to comment- I only upgraded yesterday. All this will really be HW dependent.
-
Ddbayer posted the thread PBS 4.2 No Subscription Repository on a PVE 9.1 server with Enterprise Repository in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.Hello, I have a PVE 9.1 server with PBS 4.1 installed on it. The PVE server has an Enterprise Subscription but the PBS server does not. I see that PBS 4.2 has Kernel 7.0.0-3, while the PVE 9.1 repository is still pointing to kernel 6.17. If I...
-
SStefan Radman replied to the thread PVE 6.0-7 + ixgbe firmware errors.Same here. ixgbe does not build on kernel 7. Thanks for opening the issue on github. My current workaround is to pin kernel 6.17.13-6-pve and build ixgbe-6.3.6. root@pve1:~# modinfo ixgbe | head -2 filename...
-
Mmgaudette112 replied to the thread LTO tape backups via FC - sanity check.Thanks, I'm hoping for a tape specific answer but I would imagine that it works the same, yes. Wasn't sure if FC made things appear as SCSI devices.
-
Mmattps replied to the thread [SOLVED] PVE8to9 fail.@YG-Infra really odd behaviour, after I was able to boot using a Windows ISO, I reimaged the USB using the Proxmox 8.4.1 ISO and have can boot using that now! I've entered the rescue environment and have full access to my host via http- it even...
-
SStarrbuck reacted to Stoiko Ivanov's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with
Like.
See: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#sysboot_kernel_pin by "pinning" the kernel with proxmox-boot-tool - you tell the boot-loader which kernel to boot, you can then install/upgrade the packages, and the pinned kernel would... -
Eednt replied to the thread VMs migration failed. Any idea.config: agent: 1 args: -cpu host,hypervisor=off balloon: 0 boot: order=virtio1;ide0 cores: 4 cpu: x86-64-v2-AES ide0: none,media=cdrom machine: pc-i440fx-9.2+pve1 memory: 49152 name: ZIREC-SRV-APPL02 net0...
-
FHi, Want to share my PoC of PVE on RISC-V hardware. I have created cluster of risc-v hardware, also have make tutorial for install proxmox on PVE from PVE Port Project. So i want to share that for users & dev want to work on this hardware too. I...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] 2 Nodes and ISCSI Storage.One other point - the output from "lsscsi" on server1 does not actually show two devices which would indicate a healthy multipath device. Your "multipath -ll" also shows single path. So although you now have an "mpath" device it may actually be... -
SStarrbuck reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
Why? it's purely accounting cosmetic issue and it's a test repo. Exactly this is why it's still valuable to keep it out there.
-
SStarrbuck reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
This is most likely stemming from the newer Qemu 10.2, which is also available on the test repo and is likely an accounting issue, but we're looking into that in any case.
-
JAls Testumgebung kann man so ein Teil nehmen, als Produktivsystem wären mir solche NoName-Dinger nix...
-
JDer RAM ist bei diesem laut Hersteller (obwohl an anderer Stelle wieder steht, er würde S0s verarbeiten) nicht erweiterungsfähig. Die eingebauten 8 GByte x 4(?) sind langsamer als zwei Module zu 16. Die TDP von 45 Watt bremst einen 8C16T aus...
-
JJohannes S reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
As it seems relevant here: We've been running our CI/CD for PVE9 with Kernel 7 since it was announced on the forum and have not had any issues. Note that our testing is targeted at storage rather than networking functionality of the PVE. Cheers...
-
Jhttps://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_8_to_9#VM_Memory_Consumption_Shown_is_Higher
-
Pportedaix replied to the thread [SOLVED] Backup speed regression: 2h20m → 8h39m after PVE 8→9 / QEMU 9.2→10.1 / Ceph 18→19 upgrade.Update with the bigger-VM test (VM 162, the original 6 TiB problem case from my first post). Cluster: 12 OSDs, 3 mon, HEALTH_OK, replication 3. === rbd bench (scratch image in pool_nvme_vm, deleted after) === | Test...
-
GGMBauer replied to the thread Kaufberatung Hardware homelab.Der RAM ist bei diesem laut Hersteller (obwohl an anderer Stelle wieder steht, er würde S0s verarbeiten) nicht erweiterungsfähig. Die eingebauten 8 GByte x 4(?) sind langsamer als zwei Module zu 16. Die TDP von 45 Watt bremst einen 8C16T aus...
-
Mmattps replied to the thread [SOLVED] PVE8to9 fail.Thanks @YG-Infra , File hash is good and I can boot from a Windows 11 ISO on the same device using the same USB stick. Not sure by Etcher and Rufus are playing up with this ISO. I'll keep trying and follow up on your recovery suggestions once I...
-
SteveITS replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-security-advisories.149331/post-850782 -
jsterr reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
As it seems relevant here: We've been running our CI/CD for PVE9 with Kernel 7 since it was announced on the forum and have not had any issues. Note that our testing is targeted at storage rather than networking functionality of the PVE. Cheers...