Latest activity
-
Pportedaix replied to the thread [SOLVED] Backup speed regression: 2h20m → 8h39m after PVE 8→9 / QEMU 9.2→10.1 / Ceph 18→19 upgrade.Update with the bigger-VM test (VM 162, the original 6 TiB problem case from my first post). Cluster: 12 OSDs, 3 mon, HEALTH_OK, replication 3. === rbd bench (scratch image in pool_nvme_vm, deleted after) === | Test...
-
GGMBauer replied to the thread Kaufberatung Hardware homelab.Der RAM ist bei diesem laut Hersteller (obwohl an anderer Stelle wieder steht, er würde S0s verarbeiten) nicht erweiterungsfähig. Die eingebauten 8 GByte x 4(?) sind langsamer als zwei Module zu 16. Die TDP von 45 Watt bremst einen 8C16T aus...
-
Mmattps replied to the thread [SOLVED] PVE8to9 fail.Thanks @YG-Infra , File hash is good and I can boot from a Windows 11 ISO on the same device using the same USB stick. Not sure by Etcher and Rufus are playing up with this ISO. I'll keep trying and follow up on your recovery suggestions once I...
-
SteveITS replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-virtual-environment-security-advisories.149331/post-850782 -
jsterr reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with
Like.
As it seems relevant here: We've been running our CI/CD for PVE9 with Kernel 7 since it was announced on the forum and have not had any issues. Note that our testing is targeted at storage rather than networking functionality of the PVE. Cheers... -
jsterr reacted to SteveITS's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
Just noting later versions of PVE 8 and PBS 3 both have a NIC name pinning tool. We did that before upgrading. Edit: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs-8/pve-admin-guide.html#network_override_device_names...
-
CCookiefamily replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.@dakralex Thank you very much for the answer! That clears things up a lot. As for the modes, I think we will just need to try the modes and see what happens. TOPSIS sounds best for our production clusters as they are usually memory limited...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to fabian's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
7.0 already contained the relevant commit upstream prior to it being cut: https://git.kernel.org/linus/a664bf3d603dc3bdcf9ae47cc21e0daec706d7a5 (7.0-rc7) -
Oodobrev replied to the thread Problem with MegaRAID SAS3508 controller.Actually it's a known issue since Dec 24 2025... => https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/kernel-6-17-bug-with-megaraid-sas-hpe-mr416.178370/ It's the same issue type. They also speak about memory leak with network card drivers, I guess they're...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.It would be incorrect to say that 7.0 "is not affected". It is affected but patches have been released. Including in the PVE distribution. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
jsterr replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Thanks for the insights! Have you thought about a exlude for containers, as these get automatically moved which causes a downtime?
-
CCookiefamily replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.@EllerholdAG my staging clusters are running no-subscription repos and there the 5.2.0 pve-ha-manager is already available. I have yet to roll it out on the enterprise ones.
-
CHi! Thanks for the feedback! The load balancer takes both memory and CPU in account. Ad weighing, see the next paragraphs. The load balancer can score the balancing migrations by either one of these methods. The brute-force method (as in...
-
DDark26 reacted to beisser's post in the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available with Like.
7.0 isnt affected by it.
-
Lluckman212 reacted to Chris's post in the thread "host/benchmark" appearing in Datastore - what is that? with Like.
For reference, sent a patch for this already [0], no need for a bugzilla entry, thanks! [0] https://lore.proxmox.com/pbs-devel/20260430135931.722979-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com/T/
-
MMechanix replied to the thread Upgrade 8>9 stuck in "Welcome to Grub".Thanks for your reply. I managed to boot the server by apt reinstall grub-efi-amd64 and added a corresponding fstab entry: UUID=539B-6D66 /boot/efi vfat umask=0077 0 1 fix also found here
-
Jjtru replied to the thread LTO tape backups via FC - sanity check.I have experience with SAS-connected tape drives/libraries as well as FC-connected disk-/flash-based storage arrays, but not with FC-connected tape technology. However, for the two cases I can tell you something about, the answer is yes...
-
Bbeisser replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.7.0 isnt affected by it.
-
DDark26 replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.A new kernel with a patch for copy.fail will be available ? perhaps the version 7 of the kernel isn't impacted.
-
VVasyl_Oros replied to the thread Opt-in Linux 7.0 Kernel for Proxmox VE 9 available.I installed a new kernel on one of my servers. It seems to be running well so far — I haven’t noticed any performance changes, but memory usage appears to have decreased slightly.
-
