Latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM.As it seems relevant here: We've been running our CI/CD for PVE9 with Kernel 7 since it was announced on the forum and have not had any issues. Note that our testing is targeted at storage rather than networking functionality of the PVE. Cheers... -
Since you didn't mentioned it: Do you have a qdevice in your cluster? Otherwise you might run into a split-brain-situation: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Cluster_Manager#_corosync_external_vote_support
-
AAlexHK replied to the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM.Without knowing this thread, I updated two instances of PBS to version 4.2 earlier today - and used the proxmox-network-interface-pinning tool (and updated /etc/network/interfaces accordingly) to make sure kernel 7 won't change my interfaces...
-
Dd.oishi reacted to dakralex's post in the thread PVE 9.1.9 cannot enable new cluster resource scheduling (crs) dynamic option with
Like.
Hi! Recent security fixes in the pve-manager package forced us to ship this package earlier to all repositories (including the enterprise repository), which already contain the settings for the load balancer in the web interface. Though the load... -
Dd.oishi replied to the thread F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition With Proxmox VE 9 experience.What specific points would you like to confirm? As indicated in the URL you provided, F5 already offers information regarding BIG-IP VE on Proxmox/KVM. Therefore, the most reliable way to obtain accurate information regarding support scope and...
-
AAlexHK reacted to SteveITS's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
Just noting later versions of PVE 8 and PBS 3 both have a NIC name pinning tool. We did that before upgrading. Edit: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs-8/pve-admin-guide.html#network_override_device_names...
-
EllerholdAG replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Also: the docs seem to be missing the difference between the dynamisch and the static load scheduler. And the differences between the "brute force" and "TOPSIS" method. Google AI gave me an answer, but idk if its correct. There are more patches... -
Jjlauro replied to the thread Proxmox on aarch64 (arm64).There are some smaller cloud companies that do use proxmox, and probably more that use openshift then proxmox, but I know of at least a couple in the thousands of nodes that publicly stated they are based on it. If they would consider using ARM...
-
EllerholdAG replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Using the GUI to set the HA scheduling to "dynamic load" and checking the "Automatically rebalanceHA resources" leads to this error: crs: invalid format - format error crs.ha: value 'dynamic' does not have a value in the enumeration 'basic...
-
Oodobrev replied to the thread Problem with MegaRAID SAS3508 controller.Not sure for others but I did via storcli64. Did also update BMC and BIOS to the latest available versions : Didn't change anything.
-
-
LLeopold31 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Incorrect memory usage displayed..Perfect response. Thank you!!!
-
OOnslow replied to the thread [SOLVED] Incorrect memory usage displayed..Hi, @Leopold31 https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_8_to_9#VM_Memory_Consumption_Shown_is_Higher
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread rescue advice needed - recover info from VM - HowTo?.Proxmox is based on Debian Linux with a curated Ubuntu Kernel. The LVM is part of standard Linux implementation. There are no Proxmox-specific steps when dealing with LVM. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
dakralex replied to the thread PVE 9.1.9 cannot enable new cluster resource scheduling (crs) dynamic option.Hi! Recent security fixes in the pve-manager package forced us to ship this package earlier to all repositories (including the enterprise repository), which already contain the settings for the load balancer in the web interface. Though the load... -
IiPanini replied to the thread rescue advice needed - recover info from VM - HowTo?.Hi bbgeek17, thanks for replying. I've done a quick search and can see some light at the end of the tunnel ;-) Are you aware of any such guide related to Proxmox? I would prefer to find a guide related to Proxmox, as one of the things I found...
-
dakralex replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.Hi! Thanks for the feedback! The load balancer takes both memory and CPU in account. Ad weighing, see the next paragraphs. The load balancer can score the balancing migrations by either one of these methods. The brute-force method (as in...
-
LLucar replied to the thread vm RAM läuft voll.Der Screenshot zeigt das die VM bei 16,04GB von 16,00GB ist wie kann das sein 100.23%? free -h gibt aus: total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 15Gi 5.3Gi 750Mi 276Mi...
-
-
Jjaysee2607 replied to the thread PBS on S3 / Local chunks clarifications.Ok, I understand some more :) Just retry but puting the whole datastore in the image disc (not only the .chunk dir), then is seem work, using a 3GB image disque achieve a 24GB of data backup, resulting in 5GB S3 usage. Thanks
-
PPeter_SP replied to the thread Repositories Fehler nach Update von 8 auf 9.vielen Dank für die Antwort. ich lösche mal die Einträge. Jetzt sind alle Fehler weg. auch die beim Update - Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe!
-
SteveITS replied to the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM.Just noting later versions of PVE 8 and PBS 3 both have a NIC name pinning tool. We did that before upgrading. Edit: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs-8/pve-admin-guide.html#network_override_device_names...
