Latest activity
-
JJohannes S replied to the thread Proxmox setup with RAID 1-configuration on USB attached storage.Regarding mdadm: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Software_RAID#mdraid I agree with both gurubert and onslow that ssd is the prefered way to go for a PBS datastore but backup on hdd is still better than no backup. One possible workaround around the...
-
Ddoomedramen replied to the thread Severe system freeze with NFS on Proxmox 9 running kernel 6.14.8-2-pve when mounting NFS shares.Has this just "magically" gone away for people or just me? I have had a huge media conversion job running for the past 8 hours and it has not hung once (normally it cant do more than 30 mins).
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Boot on FC SAN for installation.This thread may be helpful: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/boot-from-san-multipath-boot-disk-proxmox-installation.164098/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox -
fstrankowski replied to the thread OCFS2(unsupported): Frage zu Belegung.Kannst Du bitte endlich aufhören hier jeden Tag hier Kistenweise AI Slop abzuladen. Langsam geht mir das wirklich auf den Keks. Ich dachte Du verstehst den Wink mit dem Zaunpfahl aber irgendwo ist auch mal Feierabend. -
JJohannes S reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Proxmox setup with RAID 1-configuration on USB attached storage with
Like.
Depending on the needs of the original poster, it may work enough well :) . I'm writing this from my own experience in a lab. So, @whostolemyname , don't feel discouraged. If you have no faster disks at the moment, use HDDs. Slow backup is better... -
JJohannes S reacted to gurubert's post in the thread Proxmox setup with RAID 1-configuration on USB attached storage with Like.
Addendum: PBS needs really fast disks and does not work well on HDD.
-
JJohannes S reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Proxmox setup with RAID 1-configuration on USB attached storage with Like.
Welcome, @whostolemyname I'm not commenting on your particular hardware. Just generally. A few points, in no particular order. 1) Keeping the backups on the same disks as the primary data is not very safe. 2) Though not optimal, you can build...
-
JJohannes S reacted to RoxyProxy's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
Thanks again everyone for your detailed answers. So far Blockbridge still sounds very interesting and when the time comes I or someone from my team might reach out to the Blockbridge Team for more information. For some of our customers who dont...
-
Ssteve-dg reacted to Stoiko Ivanov's post in the thread [SOLVED] command 'apt-get update' failed: exit code 100 with Like.
You need a subscription to use the enterprise repo see https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_Repositories
-
Ssteve-dg reacted to Alwin's post in the thread [SOLVED] command 'apt-get update' failed: exit code 100 with Like.
No gpg key, see the link. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_Repositories
-
SteveITS reacted to devaux's post in the thread Feature Request: Show VLAN tag in VM Summary "IPs" section with Like.
Hi everyone, it would be a great to see the configured VLAN tag directly in the "IPs" section of the VM/CT Summary page. Currently, one has to click into the "Hardware" or "Network" tab to verify which VLAN a NIC is assigned to. Having this... -
RRoxyProxy replied to the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions?.Thanks again everyone for your detailed answers. So far Blockbridge still sounds very interesting and when the time comes I or someone from my team might reach out to the Blockbridge Team for more information. For some of our customers who dont...
-
Dd.konyayev replied to the thread ceph-osd crashes with kernel 6.17.2-1-pve on Dell system.Has anyone performed testing on kernel version 6.17.13?
-
Wwoma replied to the thread Should I set CT Swap to 0 to prevent PVE host crashes during high memory usage?.Hi, from my experience you could run into issues as soon as sum of used LXC swap space grows beyond available swap space on that specific PVE node. Then LXCs could restart or processes inside LXC get killed as soon as they try to use even more...
-
BBu66as replied to the thread OCFS2(unsupported): Frage zu Belegung.Das ist besorgniserregend — die Allocated Pages sind nicht gesunken sondern gestiegen: von 1.673.851 auf 1.727.919, das sind +54.068 Pages ≈ +211 GiB. Die fstrim-UNMAPs werden vom Controller offensichtlich nicht in freigegebene Pages umgesetzt...
-
Mmicneu reacted to Bu66as's post in the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen? with Like.
Hallo @3n0x, so lässt sich das leider nicht eingrenzen — da brauchen wir deutlich mehr Infos: Proxmox VE Version (pveversion -v) Netzwerk-Konfiguration (cat /etc/network/interfaces) Zwischen welchen Endpunkten ist es langsam? (VM↔VM, VM↔Host...
-
JJohannes S reacted to Onslow's post in the thread Replication of a VM between two independent Proxmox clusters (LVM storage) with Like.
@katti Depending on your requirements on a how long the services can be unavailable and on how much fresh data can be lost, a workaround could be frequent backups to PBS. And restoring to the other cluster when needed). Thanks to "dirty bitmaps"...
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread HA configuration for node migration/restart only with Like.
yes. For your test vms (and other non critical) just set the HA request state to ignored. you can still live migrate them just fine.
-
JJohannes S reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread HA configuration for node migration/restart only with Like.
You realize that HA request state of started means, you know, that it should be started. If you dont want that, set a different request state.
-
JJohannes S reacted to BobhWasatch's post in the thread HA configuration for node migration/restart only with Like.
No, it still doesn't make sense. Proxmox is somehow supposed to know if this was an "intended" shutdown rather than a VM crash, and do something different in that case. And you want "on demand" machines to have high availability? What the heck...