Latest activity
-
bbgeek17 reacted to mikewich's post in the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown with
Like.
also, we are using pure flash array. i following their instructions exactly as well as several other details from other places. -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cluster unusable due to NAS disruption.In the thread you referenced the poster shows evidence of Kernel lock. While "pvestatd" is a userland process, it interacts with Linux Kernel, and specifically SMB/NFS infrastructure. If the Kernel is wedged, "kill -9" will not help. If you had...
-
Ooxmoxmoney replied to the thread Proxmox Backup Server to backup S3-storage.Any news on this?
-
Mmikewich replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.also, we are using pure flash array. i following their instructions exactly as well as several other details from other places.
-
Mmikewich replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.other commands either did not return any errors or multipath =ll does nothing so cannot post. :( lsblk root@txprx01n02:~# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS sda 8:0 0 223.1G 0 disk |-sda1...
-
Jjbaas replied to the thread Cluster unusable due to NAS disruption.Yes, the NAS has been restored and can be accessed again. I'm not a Linux expert, but I thought kill -9 would always kill a process. In this case, pvestatd won't budge. Starting a new instance also doesn't work. Any suggestions on how to move...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cluster unusable due to NAS disruption.Have you restored your NAS services? If you have similar Kernel messages in your log as the other poster, and you have restored NAS services, then it seems that Kernel is unable to unwedge itself. Reboot is likely the only option in this case...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.My recommendations for next steps are unchanged. There is nothing else I can suggest as you continue to avoid providing actual system output. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
33n0x replied to the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?.Jungs beruhigt euch. Ich wollte nur eine 17MB Datei von einem Server auf den anaderen verschieben. Das hat jedoch knapp 4 Minuten gedauert. Obwohl das Netzwerk sehr Leistungsstark ist. Und wollte wissen woran das liegen kann.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Grey question marks at containers, VMs, hosts and storage.Given that "pvesm" talks somewhat directly to storage accessible to the node where you are running it from, chances are that you have an issue with storage access that trips up "pvestatd" and other components. I would remove all storage pools...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox 9.1.6 taking a snapshot takes up t 15 minutes.Hi @HenkS , welcome to the forum. This is an expected behaviour for QCOW snapshots over NFS. VMware does not use QCOW, their proprietary VMDK format employs completely different structure and snapshot architecture. Blockbridge : Ultra low...
-
spirit replied to the thread ZFS mirror on 2x Crucial T705 (PCIe 5.0) causing txg_sync hangs under write load – no NVMe errors in dmesg.(small reminder: don't use zfs on consumer ssd/nvme . they can't handle a lot of fsync because they don't have a PLP/powercapacitor), and zfs do a lot of sync. It's really like 200~1000 iops max with this kind of drive. -
Mmikewich replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.The issue we are having is the other 2 nodes multipath-ll doesn't work. They see the multipath volume as it displays under disks, but will not display it correctly, nor allow for lower level tools to access it. I'm kind of at a loss.
-
Bbytegetter replied to the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?.Für mich ist das ein Bot. So bescheuert kann man Fragen im Mutti-Forum schreiben, aber nicht hier. Sorry.
-
Ffiveangle posted the thread tokio-runtime-worker' panicked…called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: SendError { .. } in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.Since upgrading to PBS 4.1.4-1 (from 4.1.2-1) I've been getting a nightly fail on an LXC, where it just bombs out partially through starting with a HTTP/2.0 connection failed entry. I tested a full manual backup to local storage of the LXC and it...
-
Bboisbleu replied to the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?.Er will damit sagen, dass hier so ziemlich alles an Informationen und Details fehl, um die Frage sinnvoll zu beantworten.
-
Bbytegetter replied to the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?.Installiere Upgrade von Window 95 auf 98.
-
Ttr3x posted the thread Clean install dissapears from network every 2 hours after restart. in Proxmox VE: Networking and Firewall.Dear, I'm new to proxmox and was trying to setup a litte homesever to mess around with. I bought - 2x Dell 7070 Micro - 1x Dell 7050 Micro The 7050 works without any issue's but the newer 7070 both have the same issue of not showwing up in...
-
33n0x replied to the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?.Windows ist korrekt installiert.
-
CCheliuk replied to the thread RTX 5080 (Blackwell GB203) VFIO Passthrough Failing on PVE 9.1 / Kernel 6.17 — Has Anyone Solved This?.I faced with an issue as well on the kernel 6.17 and NVIDIA A100. So, I really believe there are a lot of significant changes in the kernel 6.17 for virtualization of GPU. My idea to revert to kernel 6.8 or 6.14 for now. In case there are no real...