Latest activity
-
Bbytegetter replied to the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?.Du hast Window falsch installisiert.
-
spirit replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.yes, I was thinking exactly the same -
33n0x posted the thread Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen? in Proxmox VE (Deutsch/German).Dateien im Netzwerk verschicken sich nur sehr langsam obwohl das Netzwerk ordentlich Leistung hat - Woran kann das liegen?
-
HHenkS posted the thread Proxmox 9.1.6 taking a snapshot takes up t 15 minutes in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.Taking a snapshot from a vm with 3 qcow2 disks in total of 7Tb takes approxmately 12 minutes, the vm isn't reachable while snapshotting is running. Is this normal behavior ? ( in VMware less then a second, while users are not affected with...
-
KKhensu replied to the thread [SOLVED] Grey question marks at containers, VMs, hosts and storage.Are you certain, that you used "apt upgrade"? This could have broken some. Always use apt dist-upgrade, otherwise some dependencies could get messed up! See: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2025-March/068874.html and...
-
You are welcome! If you feel that the question is solved, you can edit the original post and select the appropriate prefix from the subject dropdown. This helps keep the forum tidy. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared... -
Ppongo posted the thread Migration from 8.4 to 9.1 issue: Failed to get cgroup support status in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello, I upgraded my VE 8.4 installation to 9.1 using apt dist-upgrade. Before starting I used pve8to9 --full to check if it was all ok: only VM.Monitor warning. After upgraded and reboot, I run pve8to9 --full again, and I received this warning...
-
WWomumba posted the thread [SOLVED] Grey question marks at containers, VMs, hosts and storage in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Hello all, I'm running a PVE cluster consisting of three HP DL380 Gen 10 hosts. All updates from PVE 6 through 9 always ran flawless, until I updated from 9.0.5 to 9.1.6 via apt update && apt upgrade which made the names of LXC containers and...
-
gurubert reacted to maxim.webster's post in the thread Setting upp Proxmox behind HAProxy with
Like.
I configured HAProxy based on this post, but simplified it and adjusted it for my environment. So far, it works and looks like this: global log /dev/log local0 log /dev/log local1 notice chroot /var/lib/haproxy user haproxy... -
gurubert reacted to louie1961's post in the thread Updating PHP in Nextcloud container/vm with Like.
LXCs are different than Docker images. To the OP, you can use standard Debian commands (apt) in an LXC to update to the new version of PHP. But I am not sure if what you need is in the backports repo or some other 3rd party repo. But, honestly...
-
Llouie1961 replied to the thread Updating PHP in Nextcloud container/vm.LXCs are different than Docker images. To the OP, you can use standard Debian commands (apt) in an LXC to update to the new version of PHP. But I am not sure if what you need is in the backports repo or some other 3rd party repo. But, honestly...
-
Llilydawson replied to the thread Central Blocklist - Filters Not Working Reliably.This sounds like it could be a rule priority issue rather than just a regex failure. In Proxmox Mail Gateway, the order of operations matters immensely. If you have any 'Accept' rules that are triggered before your Blocklist rules, the system...
-
Llilydawson replied to the thread How to allow an external website to send emails on my behalf.I agree with the point about PMG not being a full mail server, but using it as an outbound filter for a website is a very common use case. If you decide to go ahead with the port 587 setup, limiting the access to a single IP via the firewall as...
-
Mmfederanko replied to the thread [SOLVED] pvesh mem: different values between node and vm level.The endpoint for a specific VM reads additional information via QMP [0]. The concrete implementation can be seen at [1], note that I linked to the source for PVE 9, but this also holds true for PVE 8. pvesh get /nodes/endor/qemu/ --full...
-
KKhensu reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] Does Proxmox VE support host–guest time synchronization similar to VMware? with Like.
Or use the same ntp server for the host and guests
-
Jjbaas posted the thread Cluster unusable due to NAS disruption in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Just as we're about to move all virtual machines to our three-machine Proxmox cluster, a NAS with SMB shares failed. This seemed to lock up pvestatd, making it unkillable. I found an old thread...
-
JJohannes S reacted to jefersonflus's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Proxmox PHP SDK: A thin PHP wrapper with full API coverage with Like.
Hello everyone, I’d like to share an open-source project that may be useful for those integrating Proxmox VE with PHP-based systems. Proxmox PHP SDK is a lightweight and pragmatic PHP library that acts as a thin wrapper around the official...
-
JJohannes S reacted to jefersonflus's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Proxmox PHP SDK: A thin PHP wrapper with full API coverage with Like.
Thank you for the clarification and for pointing that out. I appreciate the information regarding the trademark policy. I will proceed with the necessary adjustments to the project naming and description as soon as possible to ensure compliance.
-
JJohannes S reacted to fabian's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Proxmox PHP SDK: A thin PHP wrapper with full API coverage with Like.
Thanks for sharing. Please note that Proxmox is a registered trademark, so please don't use it as part of your own product/app/tool name. You can indicate that your work is for Proxmox VE by, e.g., using a wording that avoids suggesting that this...
-
Nnec_k replied to the thread [SOLVED] Finding the reason for "adding disclaimer failed"?.Tell me, how did you solve the problem? I did the recoding and removed the <div> as above, but it doesn't fix the situation. Even though it's marked as "solved," there's no solution?