Latest activity
-
JJohannes S reacted to Bu66as's post in the thread Veeam & Proxmox bei Shared Storage via FC with
Like.
Stimmt, danke @Falk R. da habe ich mich vertan. -
RRoxyProxy reacted to pveuser's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
Hi Roxyproxy :) We are longtime users of proxmox in production. And I mean we serve up a telco stack with proxmox go 100000s of thousands of daily users. Everything we do is about uptime of service and redundancy. We started to run CEPH as a POC...
-
RRoxyProxy reacted to ebaggs's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
My company has been using Proxmox for a while now and have deployed in a variety of uses and I can confirm that Blockbridge has definitely been the most straight forward way to address the problems you've mentioned. While Proxmox doesn't official...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Questions about Proxmox with shared storage, Redundancy and support for SCSI-3 PR.Good luck. It is a hard problem to solve, especially if there are FC switches involved - the SAN view can become skewed. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox -
RRoxyProxy reacted to IsThisThingOn's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
Take this with a huge grain of salt. I don't know you or your customers :) IMHO you probably don't need HA. Redudant PSU and local storage is more than enough. And your next part is a good explanation why. That is not automatically real HA...
-
RRoxyProxy reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
Just to reference, there is OmniOS/Illumos which is a former Solaris clone which has some zfs-over-iscsi with COMSTAR and there's some iscsi-ha. I never tested it, but could be worth...
-
RRoxyProxy reacted to LnxBil's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
I'm unfamiliar with any vendor that supports ZFS-over-iSCSI. ZFS is not HA-capable, but some claimed 3rd party HA exists from unknown companies. If you don't want to limit yourself to ZFS-over-iSCSI but also want explore other viable options, go...
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen.Wie ich sagte, es geht hier nicht darum mit dem Finger auf Forumsmitglieder zu zeigen. Die Beiträge sind leicht zu finden und zu erkennen, sowohl im deutschsprachigen- wie auch im englischsprachigen Forumsteil. -
Rrobertlukan replied to the thread [SOLVED] VirtIO and Qemu-GA.More details here: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/3286
-
Bbytegetter replied to the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen.Beispiele?
-
gurubert reacted to fstrankowski's post in the thread Einführung von Einschränkungen / Kennzeichnungspflicht von KI-Beiträgen with Like.
Ich bitte um eine Diskussion/RFC zu o.g. Thematik. Mittlerweile nehmen die Beiträge welche erkenn- und nachweisbar zu nahezu ausschließlich KI-Content bestehen massiv überhand. Besteht die Möglichkeit dies einzuschränken und/oder eine... -
gurubert reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Questions about Proxmox with shared storage, Redundancy and support for SCSI-3 PR with Like.
Hi @nvanaert , There's quite a bit to unpack here. First and foremost, Proxmox VE does not monitor storage or network path health. An All Paths Down (APD) condition will not result in a node fence, nor does it interact with the VM HA subsystem...
-
Ccfgmgr reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread Questions about Proxmox with shared storage, Redundancy and support for SCSI-3 PR with Like.
Hi @nvanaert , There's quite a bit to unpack here. First and foremost, Proxmox VE does not monitor storage or network path health. An All Paths Down (APD) condition will not result in a node fence, nor does it interact with the VM HA subsystem...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Questions about Proxmox with shared storage, Redundancy and support for SCSI-3 PR.Hi @nvanaert , There's quite a bit to unpack here. First and foremost, Proxmox VE does not monitor storage or network path health. An All Paths Down (APD) condition will not result in a node fence, nor does it interact with the VM HA subsystem...
-
fstrankowski replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.Is your client able to multithread said application? I've seen (long time ago) a very nice talk from Valve about defending DDoS attacks in online games. Different topic but with the same technical aspect - PPS vs Bandwidth. Latter one neglectable...
-
WIs it possible to limit concurrent tasks? We use a large spinning disk as archive and it becomes really slow when the prune / gc / sync / verify jobs run at the same time. It would be nice when these tasks can be run sequentially: if a task is...
-
WFor reference: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6195
-
Kkosnar replied to the thread Network Optimization for High-Volume UDP Traffic in PVE.My "Client 1" connection is 1Gbps and the number are very close (957 / 1024 = 93%) I guess here is not much space to improve. This twice as much then PG1024 issue point. VM "Client 2" <-> "Server" connection is 10Gbis I measure (3.14 / 10Gbps =...
-
RRoxyProxy reacted to glarsen's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
We are a blockbridge customer for our cloud (2yrs, 2 zen4-48 clusters) and are working to migrate some larger customers onto their own blockbridges. Can't say enough about their storage knowledge and support. They are one of my favorite vendors...
-
RRoxyProxy reacted to iddig's post in the thread Storage for small clusters, any good solutions? with Like.
Just my 23 years of experience and another 3 cents. I have used ceph, synology, Nimble Storage (back in the day) as local replication. About 1.5 years ago I did some research and decided to go with BlockBridge (30TB) because of the support and...