I checked the max size (found a thread about that in the forum) and fixed it.
The CLI test was done once fixed.
it happens on incoming emails.
Emails are not bounced/refused.
They all (all the ones I looked at and that had a DKIM signature) get...
I didnt know that, but that kinda begs the question what does the dashboard offer you beyond what PVE presents; if it really something necessary, I'd probably just set up ceph with cephadm seperate from pve. PVE doesnt consider the entirety of...
It is a showstopper for the dashboard, which has it as a hard requirement. (Perhaps that’s a bug on Ceph’s part, but right now that’s what we have to deal with downstream.) Also, yes, I could spin up a separate smbd, but it would be nice to have...
I had the same issue.
:~# rbd rm vNTDB-Storage/vm-112-disk-0
2019-08-01 14:22:29.567286 7fc2b97fa700 -1 librbd::image::RemoveRequest: 0x560d820f5470 check_image_watchers: image has watchers - not removing
Removing image: 0% complete...failed...
As PDM is only on V1.0 this may not be a feature as of yet but I thought I would ask encase I have missed something. on my PVE nodes I have set a 'Tag Style Override' which works fine on the PVE nodes but this does not propagate over to PDM. Is...
siehe: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/dkim_invalid-but-dkim-is-valid.180964/post-839411
(ist die max spamsize >= die max email size)?
falls das nicht das problem ist - könnte es noch am verwendeten DNS Resolver für PMG liegen.
ein lokaler...
This is explained in the docs, which @mfederanko linked:
you need to change the signing domain source to 'header' instead of envelope.
I hope this helps!
Do you have a log of one the emails that bounce/get rejected because of the DKIM-INVALID error? That may help.
1)Are the emails that have this error incoming or outgoing emails?
1)Are you running your own DNS? What DNS is your PMG using?
2)Are...
On a hunch - check that your max spam size (GUI->Configuration->Spam Detector->Options) is as large as your max email size (GUI->Configuration->Mail Proxy->Options) - else spamassassin only sees a truncated version of the mail, which yields an...
Thanks for the heads up. Pretty sure most where created with Ceph Reef except a few that got recreated recently with Squid 19.2.3. I'm aware of that bug, but given that I don't use EC pools (Ceph bugreport mentions it seems to only happen on OSD...
Actually the limit for TXT records is 255 bytes (within a pair of quotes) which normally translates to 255 characters, and afaik this is universal and does not depend on your registrar. Normally you only run into this limit with 2048+ bit...
no - PMG does not have support for SRS - from a quick look online there are a few projects that implement this for postfix - some seem even packaged in Debian: https://github.com/roehling/postsrsd - It might be possible to adapt the postfix...
The setup: it's a PVE 9.1.5 server who launches the backup; it The PBS machine has been recently upgraded to 4.1.2.
As reported above, the command that launched this particular backup was:
proxmox-backup-client backup giov.pxar:/rpool/giov...
yes - a status of delivered means that the receiving mailserver sent a 2xx code (meaning it accepts the mail for delivery) when PMG tried to send the mail
no for both questions - in general a mail-server only knows if the receiving mail-server...
Yes some DNS/Registrars require it to be split into multiple DNS entries, sometimes formatted in particular ways based on the Registrars requirements. I've definitely run into this when I increased my Key Size to 4096.
Nein, hier geht es nicht ums Forum sondern dass falsche Fakten da stehen. Ganz einfach.
Dann verlinke das nächste Mal einfach das offizielle Wiki, da steht es auch korrekt.
Hallo,
wir wollen eigentlich einen Filter DKIM_INVALID setzen und diese Mails als Spam einstufen.
Bei einigen Tests sehe ich jedoch eine Vielzahl bekannter Sender, deren DKIM angeblich invalid ist.
Beispiele sind yahoo.com, gmail.com, gmx.net...
Tested and no route. In fact there is no gateway on 10.26.22.0/0. All I can think of is that the PVE management interface is connecting with the management interface of the SAN and falsely reporting? or iscsiadm is falsely reporting because there...