I think I'll opt for this one.
Price is feasible for me.
The true question :
Cluster YES
HA YES
CEPHS ? (no to complexe to much ressources used)
ZFS with replicas (Surely YES)
LVM-THIN with rsync replicas with cron ?
ZFS - What NVME M2 ?
- Thread starter stanthewizzard2025
- Start date
Price is feasible for me.
The true question :
Cluster YES
HA YES
CEPHS ? (no to complexe to much ressources used)
ZFS with replicas (Surely YES)
LVM-THIN with rsync replicas with cron ?
Yes. Personally I would choose the Micron - but without a hard reason, just because the overall features seem to be a bit better. All three of them look good.
Decide by price...?
Choosing one or the other depends on several factors. "Actually shared" being the main difference.
Personally I am a ZFS enthusiast. If you can accept data loss betrween one replication point-in-time to the other then this is the best filesystem you can get. Without it you lose some nice features: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/f...y-a-few-disks-should-i-use-zfs-at-all.160037/
I had used Ceph "productive" in my small Homelab(!) for 15 months. Some "gotchas": https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabu-can-i-use-ceph-in-a-_very_-small-cluster.159671/
If you have enough resources you can use both systems - to get the best of two worlds
ZFS use a lot of ram (that i need) (and can be mitigated)Choosing one or the other depends on several factors. "Actually shared" being the main difference.
Personally I am a ZFS enthusiast. If you can accept data loss betrween one replication point-in-time to the other then this is the best filesystem you can get. Without it you lose some nice features: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/f...y-a-few-disks-should-i-use-zfs-at-all.160037/
I had used Ceph "productive" in my small Homelab(!) for 15 months. Some "gotchas": https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabu-can-i-use-ceph-in-a-_very_-small-cluster.159671/
If you have enough resources you can use both systems - to get the best of two worlds
Very intensive for NVME (but I'll surely change it)
Perf is not awesome compared to LVM-Thin
I'm mixed
I'm also looking for starwind vsan. That could be a good solution (but I want also stick to full opensource)
very interesting for CEPHSChoosing one or the other depends on several factors. "Actually shared" being the main difference.
Personally I am a ZFS enthusiast. If you can accept data loss betrween one replication point-in-time to the other then this is the best filesystem you can get. Without it you lose some nice features: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/f...y-a-few-disks-should-i-use-zfs-at-all.160037/
I had used Ceph "productive" in my small Homelab(!) for 15 months. Some "gotchas": https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabu-can-i-use-ceph-in-a-_very_-small-cluster.159671/
If you have enough resources you can use both systems - to get the best of two worlds
ZFS is the way but not with my actual crucial drive and I can give 12gb of RAM max (need those precious Gb for VMs)
From the Proxmox docs :
"For new installations starting with Proxmox VE 8.1, the ARC usage limit will be set to 10 % of the installed physical memory, clamped to a maximum of 16 GiB. This value is written to /etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf."
Here limited to 2GB without notice impact, flash only zpool.
I know this "new" limit to 10% but 2gb is really nothing. You have good perf (don't say you have or I'll break with vault to buy Micron NVME LOL)
An SSD with PLP and ECC would be the minimum. The higher the quality, the better, for obvious reasons.Hello
Would like to know what would be best for ZFS ?
MICRON|7450 Pro
Samsung PM9A3 M.2
Kingston Data Center DC2000B
Thanks for inputs