When running pmg7to8 we see:
WARN: systemd-timesyncd is not the best choice for time-keeping on servers, due to only applying updates on boot.
It's recommended to use one of:
* chrony
* ntpsec
* openntpd
as this is mentioned in pve too, we checked it (all our servers running systemd-timesyncd) and imo the fact "due to only applying updates on boot" is not correct (despite that maybe chrony is a better choice anyway).
if I understand the manpage correctly (eg https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-timesyncd.service.8.html) systemd-timesyncd behaves exactly like the good ol' ntpd. big jumps only on boot, during runtime in small steps.
Am I wrong?
WARN: systemd-timesyncd is not the best choice for time-keeping on servers, due to only applying updates on boot.
It's recommended to use one of:
* chrony
* ntpsec
* openntpd
as this is mentioned in pve too, we checked it (all our servers running systemd-timesyncd) and imo the fact "due to only applying updates on boot" is not correct (despite that maybe chrony is a better choice anyway).
if I understand the manpage correctly (eg https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-timesyncd.service.8.html) systemd-timesyncd behaves exactly like the good ol' ntpd. big jumps only on boot, during runtime in small steps.
Am I wrong?