Hello,
I am running a two node cluster for testing purposes (Vers. 3.0-23 / 957f0862)
Currently I am evaluating the HA feature and there I found a strange behavior:
Whenever I assign HA to stopped VMs those VMs will be started on node A always even they have been located on node B before.
Is this a default behavior or do we have some misconfiguration?
Where can I start searching to avoid this unintentional migration?
I have another test environment (also two node cluster but Version 2.2-32) where a vm starts on that node it was located originally before I assign HA.
Any hints are appreciated.
I am running a two node cluster for testing purposes (Vers. 3.0-23 / 957f0862)
Currently I am evaluating the HA feature and there I found a strange behavior:
Whenever I assign HA to stopped VMs those VMs will be started on node A always even they have been located on node B before.
Is this a default behavior or do we have some misconfiguration?
Where can I start searching to avoid this unintentional migration?
I have another test environment (also two node cluster but Version 2.2-32) where a vm starts on that node it was located originally before I assign HA.
Any hints are appreciated.