A fresh installation of Proxmox VE 1.0 defaults to a root volume of almost 70 GB (700 mb used). This is way to large and because it's a SAS RAID setup, the harddisk space is expensive.
According to this thread:
http://www.proxmox.com/forum/showthread.php?p=3882
you shouldn't make the root volume too small because vzdump might require the free space. Dietmar suggests not making the root volume smaller than 20gb. Why is that?
From the OpenVZ wiki: "Note that using LVM2 and vzdump to create snapshots requires 512Mb of free space in your VG as described here."
And from what I understand you don't need as much temporary space as is required for the whole container you're dumping.
I won't put the dumps themselves on the root volume.
So could it be that as a minimum 700+512mb whould suffice for the root volume? In that case I was thinking of using 4gb just to be on the safe side (reinstall with # linux maxroot=4 swapsize=4).
Is it also possible to make one large root volume without a seperate data volume? The only disadvantage to this I see is an increased chance the root filesystem will get corrupted and won't boot anymore. This doesn't mather because the system is useless without the data partition and I have to go to the datacenter to fix it anyway.
According to this thread:
http://www.proxmox.com/forum/showthread.php?p=3882
you shouldn't make the root volume too small because vzdump might require the free space. Dietmar suggests not making the root volume smaller than 20gb. Why is that?
From the OpenVZ wiki: "Note that using LVM2 and vzdump to create snapshots requires 512Mb of free space in your VG as described here."
And from what I understand you don't need as much temporary space as is required for the whole container you're dumping.
I won't put the dumps themselves on the root volume.
So could it be that as a minimum 700+512mb whould suffice for the root volume? In that case I was thinking of using 4gb just to be on the safe side (reinstall with # linux maxroot=4 swapsize=4).
Is it also possible to make one large root volume without a seperate data volume? The only disadvantage to this I see is an increased chance the root filesystem will get corrupted and won't boot anymore. This doesn't mather because the system is useless without the data partition and I have to go to the datacenter to fix it anyway.