Hi there,
We are currently running Proxmox VE 6.2-4 on Dell PowerEdge R640 machines.
The servers each have two NICs installed, the network cables are divided across two switches in a datacenter.
At the moment we are using a total of four physical NIC ports per server (divided across the two NICs).
The network configuration is bonding (active-backup) and on top of that two VMBRs.
Now I'm trying to accomplish the following, we have added two more cables per server also divided across the two NICs and switches,
the switch port is configured to use a VLAN with two different network segments. Now I would like to create two bonds across the
two NICs and on top of that two VMBRs. I'm thinking of something like (shortened):
Is such a configuration possible, I have tried it on my testenvironment, it seems to work but I would like to know if this is the recommended way, or is there a better alternative perhaps? I'm editing the interfaces file manually b.t.w.
Thank you in advance!
We are currently running Proxmox VE 6.2-4 on Dell PowerEdge R640 machines.
The servers each have two NICs installed, the network cables are divided across two switches in a datacenter.
At the moment we are using a total of four physical NIC ports per server (divided across the two NICs).
The network configuration is bonding (active-backup) and on top of that two VMBRs.
Now I'm trying to accomplish the following, we have added two more cables per server also divided across the two NICs and switches,
the switch port is configured to use a VLAN with two different network segments. Now I would like to create two bonds across the
two NICs and on top of that two VMBRs. I'm thinking of something like (shortened):
Code:
auto bond1
iface bond1 inet manual
auto bond1:0
iface bond1:0 inet manual
auto vmbr1
iface vmbr1 inet static
address MYADDRESSRANGE
bridge-ports bond1
bridge-stp off
bridge-fd 0
auto vmbr2
iface vmbr2 inet static
address MYADDRESSRANGE
bridge-ports bond1:0
bridge-stp off
bridge-fd 0
Is such a configuration possible, I have tried it on my testenvironment, it seems to work but I would like to know if this is the recommended way, or is there a better alternative perhaps? I'm editing the interfaces file manually b.t.w.
Thank you in advance!
Last edited: