Hi all,
Inspired by a thread about ceph and which scheduler to use in a VM I made a quick test using fio. Results are stunning so I hope others can duplicate my results?
My storage is based on ZFS.
Test file used:
Results
It seems scheduler has a big impact on performance when dealing with file systems with native sophisticated caching.
Inspired by a thread about ceph and which scheduler to use in a VM I made a quick test using fio. Results are stunning so I hope others can duplicate my results?
My storage is based on ZFS.
Test file used:
Code:
# This job file tries to mimic the Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern
[global]
description=Emulation of Intel IOmeter File Server Access Pattern
Sorry, wrong forum
[iometer]
bssplit=512/10:1k/5:2k/5:4k/60:8k/2:16k/4:32k/4:64k/10
rw=randrw
rwmixread=80
direct=1
size=4g
ioengine=libaio
# IOMeter defines the server loads as the following:
# iodepth=1 Linear
# iodepth=4 Very Light
# iodepth=8 Light
# iodepth=64 Moderate
# iodepth=256 Heavy
iodepth=64
Results
Code:
NFS iSCSI
CFQ r:4537 w:1130 r: 6927 w: 1733
NOOP r:7484 w:1874 r: 11454 w: 2874