Please be more specific and describe what issue you are facing now, otherwise we will not be able to helpnow i got issues with accessing it, which is weird. Thanks !
failed to access bucket: bucket does not exist or no permission to access it (400)Please be more specific and describe what issue you are facing now, otherwise we will not be able to help![]()
What provider are you using? How does your endpoint config look like? The error stem from a head bucket api call, and might indicate that the request signature might be incorrect. That can happen if e.g. the region is not correct.failed to access bucket: bucket does not exist or no permission to access it (400)
not familiar with that one, does it work if you provideI am using idrive e2, which is amazon s3 compatible.
paris
or auto
as region. Otherwise i will take a closer look. Further, no need to explicitely provide the port if you are using the default 443
.what region did you set for s3fs?i'm using it with s3fs on proxmox usually
Great, thanks for also sharing the settings that work for you, might help others using the same provider so highly appreciated!region eu-par-1
Currently only the local cache statistics are shown, a S3 dashboard is planned for future versions, however not implemented yet, see and subscribe https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6563but now it is showing the PBS storage and not the s3 storage which is weird ?
No, the local cache is used as persistent cache for the backups data and metadata to reduce requests required to the s3 backend. For recommendations see https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/storage.html#datastores-with-s3-backendSo i don't understand. Do i have to put more storage locally ?
I am not so sure to understand why i do see my backup being in the local cache AND in the s3 bucket
So i do have to use double the storage that i want to store in the s3 bucket ?No, the local cache is used as persistent cache for the backups data and metadata to reduce requests required to the s3 backend. For recommendations see https://pbs.proxmox.com/docs/storage.html#datastores-with-s3-backend
No, the cache can be way smaller than the backup data, otherwise it would not make any sense. It will however use the storage space available to it, therefore the recommendation for a dedicated device or quotas. But you must use a persistent storage device for it.So i do have to use double the storage that i want to store in the s3 bucket ?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.