S3 not showing on my 4.0.11 PBS ?

Hi,
please try to clear the browser cache and reload the page, maybe you are still being server javascript files from the cache.
 
now i got issues with accessing it, which is weird. Thanks !
Please be more specific and describe what issue you are facing now, otherwise we will not be able to help ;)
 
Please be more specific and describe what issue you are facing now, otherwise we will not be able to help ;)
failed to access bucket: bucket does not exist or no permission to access it (400)



But if i try with the same key access with another soft (s3fs / winscp), i have read write access to the bucket

I am seeing the buckets, but i can't access it from pbs, which is weird
 
failed to access bucket: bucket does not exist or no permission to access it (400)
What provider are you using? How does your endpoint config look like? The error stem from a head bucket api call, and might indicate that the request signature might be incorrect. That can happen if e.g. the region is not correct.
 
I am using idrive e2, which is amazon s3 compatible.
i'm using it with s3fs on proxmox usually

Theres no region since it simply says "Paris" on my end


EDIT : found eu-par-1 but still the same issues
1754498618205.png
 
Last edited:
I am using idrive e2, which is amazon s3 compatible.
not familiar with that one, does it work if you provide paris or auto as region. Otherwise i will take a closer look. Further, no need to explicitely provide the port if you are using the default 443.

i'm using it with s3fs on proxmox usually
what region did you set for s3fs?
 
it finally worked by using 1754499023231.png and region eu-par-1


edit : it works also with the provider quirks set to default
 
Last edited:
but now it is showing the PBS storage and not the s3 storage which is weird ?
Does it need the local cache to first download the backups and then send them ?
1754499092889.png
 
Last edited:
So i don't understand. Do i have to put more storage locally ?

I am not so sure to understand why i do see my backup being in the local cache AND in the s3 bucket
 
So i do have to use double the storage that i want to store in the s3 bucket ?
No, the cache can be way smaller than the backup data, otherwise it would not make any sense. It will however use the storage space available to it, therefore the recommendation for a dedicated device or quotas. But you must use a persistent storage device for it.

Since I do not know what you are uploading and how your current storage usage ecc is, it is hard to tell ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: spleenftw
I can see a similar issue with myQNAPcloud:

1754688178175.png

I can list the buckets, but if I try to configure the datastore, I am getting:

1754688246993.png


Is working fine if I access it with ForkLift:

1754688314899.png

No idea how I can fix this.
 
Last edited: