Rules with multi WHAT objects

[Davide Bozzelli]

I'm trying to create a rule with the following items:
1: WHAT: a particular item
WHAT: spam score = 3
DIRECTION=in
ACTION=quarantine

So what i'm expecting is:
EVERY incoming mail that have the header specified AND spam score is >=3 is matched by the rule and therefore quarantinated

What happened:

EVERY incmong mail that have the header specified REGARDELESS by the spam score is quarantinated.

SO my question is: multiple WHAT objects is chained by OR or by AND , in other words should be interpreted as "IF what1 AND what2 is matched THEN do something" or interpreted as "IF what1 OR what2 is matched then DO something".

Thx in advance

 

[dietmar]

OR ("IF what1 OR what2 is matched then DO something")

 

[Davide Bozzelli]

Thx

 

[Davide Bozzelli]

Ok but something in my knowledge is missing.

So:
1) what1+ what2 should be read as "what1 OR what2"
2) what1 or what2 are generic objects that can contains a list of different items
3) the list of 2) should be chained each other with an OR operator

The question actually is: what is the utilily of having and OR in a rule connecting multiple what object if every object (what object) is by itself
a logical concatenation of OR items ?

Thx