I believe the current RAM usage for Linux VM not to be accurate. I would expect the reported value (under Summary) to be take from free's used column
Where instead it seems like a different calculation is made (used+buffer+cache)
It is normal for Linux to buffer and cache as much as it needs/can but we all know by now that's not real memory demand.
So I would not personally report the buffer/cache (so short yellow bar only) but if you still think there's a value in this can the colors be changed for each of them? e.g.
The very same principle applies to the node.What you call "RAM usage"
It's rather "RAM allocated" which can easily raise above the amount of RAM installed on the system (oversubscribed). Perhaps this second chart should be split into two like Ram usage (actual demand considering balooning if any) and RAM allocated.
If you do go the way I'm suggesting the node should also report on allocated CPUs that can be oversubscribed as well.
Thanks
Where instead it seems like a different calculation is made (used+buffer+cache)
It is normal for Linux to buffer and cache as much as it needs/can but we all know by now that's not real memory demand.
So I would not personally report the buffer/cache (so short yellow bar only) but if you still think there's a value in this can the colors be changed for each of them? e.g.
The very same principle applies to the node.What you call "RAM usage"
It's rather "RAM allocated" which can easily raise above the amount of RAM installed on the system (oversubscribed). Perhaps this second chart should be split into two like Ram usage (actual demand considering balooning if any) and RAM allocated.
If you do go the way I'm suggesting the node should also report on allocated CPUs that can be oversubscribed as well.
Thanks
Last edited: