Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.0 released!

[nathansurendran]

Hi, new to all this... I've been on a bit of a merry song and dance between Trixie and Bookworm on an attempted Proxmox VE local install, because although the downloads page at https://www.proxmox.com/en/downloads says I'm downloading version 9.0-1, when I checked it with the Windows checksum hash matching algorithm and then got Gemini to match to the hash from the downloads page, it suggested that it was actually Proxmox 8 via the download link even though it was labelled Proxmox 9:

Yes, they are an exact match.

---

Comparison

• Hash from your certutil error:228f948ae696f2448460443f4b619157cab78ee69802acc0d06761ebd4f51c3e
• Hash I identified (Proxmox VE 8.0.2):228f948ae696f2448460443f4b619157cab78ee69802acc0d06761ebd4f51c3e

---

Conclusion
This confirms that your downloaded file, named proxmox-ve_9.0-1 (1).iso, is actually the Proxmox VE 8.0.2 installer.

Even though the filename says version 9.0-1, the file's content is verifiably version 8.0.2. If you need the newer version, you should download it again from the official Proxmox website.

Can someone please check this and get back to me?

 

[t.lamprecht]

Hi, new to all this... I've been on a bit of a merry song and dance between Trixie and Bookworm on an attempted Proxmox VE local install, because although the downloads page at https://www.proxmox.com/en/downloads says I'm downloading version 9.0-1, when I checked it with the Windows checksum hash matching algorithm and then got Gemini to match to the hash from the downloads page, it suggested that it was actually Proxmox 8 via the download link even though it was labelled Proxmox 9:

Can someone please check this and get back to me?

Eh, I would not trust "AI" too much, especially not for any integrity things and if it's just comparing a simple string...
The SHA256 sum from proxmox-ve_9.0-1.iso is indeed 228f948ae696f2448460443f4b619157cab78ee69802acc0d06761ebd4f51c3e as listed on www.proxmox.com and in the signed SHA256SUMS file on https://enterprise.proxmox.com/iso/

Just check yourself (without LLM).

 

[ness1602]

I don't get why you need LLM to check sha.

 

[fiona]

Hi,

Hi, new to all this... I've been on a bit of a merry song and dance between Trixie and Bookworm on an attempted Proxmox VE local install, because although the downloads page at https://www.proxmox.com/en/downloads says I'm downloading version 9.0-1, when I checked it with the Windows checksum hash matching algorithm and then got Gemini to match to the hash from the downloads page, it suggested that it was actually Proxmox 8 via the download link even though it was labelled Proxmox 9:

Can someone please check this and get back to me?

Then report the issue to Google please and not here And I suggest you read up more on what LLMs can and cannot do and not just trust marketing hype.

 

[RealPjotr]

I upgraded my Epyc 8434P with Asrockrack SIENAD8-2L2T. I went from Proxmox 8.4 with kernel 6.11 to Proxmox 9 with kernel 6.14. Unfortunately it went unstable, crashing with nothing in the logs twice in 24 hours. I reverted to kernel 6.11 again (still in Proxmox 9) and it's stable for a few days again.

I still suspect PCIe sharing to VM (SATA to a TrueNAS VM) causing the crash due to a bug in 6.14, which is supposedly not fixed until kernel 6.16.

So I will make a try with the new opt-in kernel 6.17 soon.