So we have a 6-node prox cluster and several stand-alone proxmox servers (all 8.0.4) with PBS at 3.0-3). PBS is available on all nodes in our cluster and our stand-alone servers.
Well, today, something weird happened. I ran a snapshot backup of a CT on one of our standalone nodes to our PBS, and it appears to have assumed the identity of a CT on our cluster using the same naming convention and everything. I say "assumed the identity" because I have no other way to explain it. Both snapshots show up under ct/101 in my root namespace.
They are listed separately, and the comments for each match the correct snapshot, everything looks fine, I did a test restore on both, and it worked, I guess my question is if this is the expected way to do this or if am I messing something up using PBS in this manner? If I didn't have a comment on the snapshots I am not sure I would have known which snapshot was which since they are both under ct/101.
Well, today, something weird happened. I ran a snapshot backup of a CT on one of our standalone nodes to our PBS, and it appears to have assumed the identity of a CT on our cluster using the same naming convention and everything. I say "assumed the identity" because I have no other way to explain it. Both snapshots show up under ct/101 in my root namespace.
They are listed separately, and the comments for each match the correct snapshot, everything looks fine, I did a test restore on both, and it worked, I guess my question is if this is the expected way to do this or if am I messing something up using PBS in this manner? If I didn't have a comment on the snapshots I am not sure I would have known which snapshot was which since they are both under ct/101.
