Hey all,
Im using PBS for VM and LXC backup like we all do, but its also possible to backup regular files.
Ive been reading a bit about backups and ended up with Borg to do my backups. In progress of redoing all previouly scripted rsync backup strategies.
Now comparing PBS to Borg, they both do things `the same` im interested in.
-Dedup (using chunks), with prunable history
-compress (PBS on ZFS compression on)
PBS has a clickable GUI where i can download a single file from a snapshot, whereas with Borg i need to find a snapshot and cli-mount it, hopeing its in this particular snapshot.
To declutter even more im keen on learning why i should or should not use PBS to do the file backup of 3 to 4 TB of random files?
-Speed?
-Network usage of incremental backups after initial full backup?
-CPU cycles?
-Excessive HDD IO on client or PBS each incremental round?
-Chunk size?
Enlighten me
thx!
Im using PBS for VM and LXC backup like we all do, but its also possible to backup regular files.
Ive been reading a bit about backups and ended up with Borg to do my backups. In progress of redoing all previouly scripted rsync backup strategies.
Now comparing PBS to Borg, they both do things `the same` im interested in.
-Dedup (using chunks), with prunable history
-compress (PBS on ZFS compression on)
PBS has a clickable GUI where i can download a single file from a snapshot, whereas with Borg i need to find a snapshot and cli-mount it, hopeing its in this particular snapshot.
To declutter even more im keen on learning why i should or should not use PBS to do the file backup of 3 to 4 TB of random files?
-Speed?
-Network usage of incremental backups after initial full backup?
-CPU cycles?
-Excessive HDD IO on client or PBS each incremental round?
-Chunk size?
Enlighten me

Last edited: