i cant really narrow down to what it is.
We've redone the switch config and the local network configs.
Sometimes ssh just works and other times it doesnt.
When it works, its says
debug2: peer server KEXINIT proposal
debug2: KEX algorithms: curve25519-sha256,
curve25519-sha256@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group16-sha512,diffie-hellman-group18-sha512,diffie-hellman-group14-sha256
debug2: host key algorithms: rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519
debug2: ciphers ctos:
chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,
aes128-gcm@openssh.com,
aes256-gcm@openssh.com
debug2: ciphers stoc:
chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,
aes128-gcm@openssh.com,
aes256-gcm@openssh.com
debug2: MACs ctos:
umac-64-etm@openssh.com,
umac-128-etm@openssh.com,
hmac-sha2-256-etm@openssh.com,
hmac-sha2-512-etm@openssh.com,
hmac-sha1-etm@openssh.com,
umac-64@openssh.com,
umac-128@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha1
debug2: MACs stoc:
umac-64-etm@openssh.com,
umac-128-etm@openssh.com,
hmac-sha2-256-etm@openssh.com,
hmac-sha2-512-etm@openssh.com,
hmac-sha1-etm@openssh.com,
umac-64@openssh.com,
umac-128@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha1
when it does not, it says:
debug2: peer server KEXINIT proposal
debug2: KEX algorithms: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1
debug2: host key algorithms: rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ssh-rsa
debug2: ciphers ctos: aes256-ctr,aes256-cbc,aes192-ctr,aes192-cbc,aes128-ctr,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc
debug2: ciphers stoc: aes256-ctr,aes256-cbc,aes192-ctr,aes192-cbc,aes128-ctr,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc
debug2: MACs ctos: hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha1,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5,hmac-md5-96
debug2: MACs stoc: hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha1,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5,hmac-md5-96
Without changing anything. It just alternates on its own.
It is driving me nuts.
EDIT: i've got a hot trace that might actually lead to the firewall. Im investigating further. Yet, it is absolutely not clear, why it is only showing this effect only on one node ..