Hello All,
I'm trying to be diligent in that I am currently simulating a "total loss" and trying to restore from our pbs tapes with only the tapes, our tape library, and a blanked server.
I have installed pbs to the blanked server. I have connected the tape library and imported the tape encryption key, and thirteen of our fourteen tapes were inventoried fine since catalogs were detected on them. Only one tape had no catalog. This tape is now about six hours into being "cataloged" manually since no catalog was found on it.
I note that this tape also happens to be our most recently written tape. Each of our weekly backups to tape writes to two tapes. And this is the second of those two tapes, written just this last weekend.
So, my question is: Why, of all our tapes, does this one, latest tape not have a catalog on it?
I have a theory: Our media pool is set to an allocation policy of "always" which creates a new media set with each backup job. So, last weekend's backup job created the media set and then was essentially "holding it open" until next weekend's job starts? At which point, next week, it would have "closed" the existing media set, written the catalog to the tape, and created a new media set. So, in the future, if I want to have the catalog written to our latest tape earlier, I should schedule the creation of a new media shortly after I expect the tape backup job to finish rather than leaving it to "always" create a new one when the next backup job runs. Is this correct?
Thanks!
--Brian
I'm trying to be diligent in that I am currently simulating a "total loss" and trying to restore from our pbs tapes with only the tapes, our tape library, and a blanked server.
I have installed pbs to the blanked server. I have connected the tape library and imported the tape encryption key, and thirteen of our fourteen tapes were inventoried fine since catalogs were detected on them. Only one tape had no catalog. This tape is now about six hours into being "cataloged" manually since no catalog was found on it.
I note that this tape also happens to be our most recently written tape. Each of our weekly backups to tape writes to two tapes. And this is the second of those two tapes, written just this last weekend.
So, my question is: Why, of all our tapes, does this one, latest tape not have a catalog on it?
I have a theory: Our media pool is set to an allocation policy of "always" which creates a new media set with each backup job. So, last weekend's backup job created the media set and then was essentially "holding it open" until next weekend's job starts? At which point, next week, it would have "closed" the existing media set, written the catalog to the tape, and created a new media set. So, in the future, if I want to have the catalog written to our latest tape earlier, I should schedule the creation of a new media shortly after I expect the tape backup job to finish rather than leaving it to "always" create a new one when the next backup job runs. Is this correct?
Thanks!
--Brian