netmap (+VALE) + QEMU

mipsH

Renowned Member
According to this article:

https://www.linux-kvm.org/images/c/c5/Kvm-forum-2013-High-Performance-IO-for-VMs.pdf

Using netmap with VALE switch ( http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/vale/ ) will get a much higher throughput even 5x than virtio (from presentation, for 64 byte packets up to 2.5Mpps in contrary to virtio : 0.5 Mpps).


netmap explained:
http://changeofelia.info.ucl.ac.be/pmwiki/uploads/SummerSchool/Program/poster_006.pdf

QEMU config looks like:
qemu -device e1000,netdev=n,mac= . . . -netdev netmap,id=n,ifname=valeA:x . . .

(Frankly i do not investigate more, maybe this project is in merge with some other or not )

Maybe to consider it in the near future Proxmox VE releases or just further investigate.


BR,
Hrvoje.
 
Update:
VALE/DPDK/OVS performance tests : http://cnp.neclab.eu/vale

According to this article:
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/dpdk/
OpenvSwitch can be build using DPDK library's for fast packet processing, so this can be another approach.

One more interesting presentation regarding OVS, QEMU, DPDK and netmap:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/18/1630-ovs-rizzo-talk.pdf

... and the netmap passthrough (as described in text below, use less CPU than DPDK ):
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/papers/20150315-netmap-passthrough.pdf
 
Last edited:

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!