Hello,
since yesterday I have a problem with my lxc containers. First I noticed the following behavior:
When attaching a screen inside the container (with screen -r ...) the following message appeared: WriteMessage: Too much references: can't splice (German: WriteMessage: Zu viele Referenzen: can't splice).
I first tried shutting down the container and booting it up again. But the start of the container failed with the following message:
Then I searched a bit on the internet. I tried booting up the server with the following command: lxc-start -n 225 --foreground --logfile test.log --logpriority=2
The server was booting up fine. The content of the test.log file is the following:
After shutting down the server again, I tried booting it up just via the following command: lxc-start -n 225
The problem is occuring on all of the lxc containers on this node. It is not a problem with this specific container.
Here is the output of pveversion -v:
When I run apt update and apt upgrade and apt dist-upgrade, there are no new packages available.
By the way: After starting the container with the command lxc-start -n <ID>, the problem with attaching a screen still persists. Maybe this is related to the startup problem?
On this node are a lot of VMs running, so a reboot of the node wouldn't be optimal.
Thank you for help time and your help!
Best Regards
since yesterday I have a problem with my lxc containers. First I noticed the following behavior:
When attaching a screen inside the container (with screen -r ...) the following message appeared: WriteMessage: Too much references: can't splice (German: WriteMessage: Zu viele Referenzen: can't splice).
I first tried shutting down the container and booting it up again. But the start of the container failed with the following message:
Code:
Job for pve-container@225.service failed because the control process exited with error code.
See "systemctl status pve-container@225.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
TASK ERROR: command 'systemctl start pve-container@225' failed: exit code 1
Then I searched a bit on the internet. I tried booting up the server with the following command: lxc-start -n 225 --foreground --logfile test.log --logpriority=2
The server was booting up fine. The content of the test.log file is the following:
Code:
lxc-start 225 20201123084310.952 ERROR conf - conf.c:lxc_setup_boot_id:3527 - Permission denied - Failed to mount /dev/.lxc-boot-id to /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id
After shutting down the server again, I tried booting it up just via the following command: lxc-start -n 225
The problem is occuring on all of the lxc containers on this node. It is not a problem with this specific container.
Here is the output of pveversion -v:
Code:
proxmox-ve: 6.1-2 (running kernel: 5.3.18-2-pve)
pve-manager: 6.1-7 (running version: 6.1-7/13e58d5e)
pve-kernel-helper: 6.1-6
pve-kernel-5.3: 6.1-5
pve-kernel-5.3.18-2-pve: 5.3.18-2
ceph-fuse: 12.2.11+dfsg1-2.1+b1
corosync: 3.0.3-pve1
criu: 3.11-3
glusterfs-client: 5.5-3
ifupdown: 0.8.35+pve1
ksm-control-daemon: 1.3-1
libjs-extjs: 6.0.1-10
libknet1: 1.15-pve1
libpve-access-control: 6.0-6
libpve-apiclient-perl: 3.0-3
libpve-common-perl: 6.0-13
libpve-guest-common-perl: 3.0-3
libpve-http-server-perl: 3.0-4
libpve-storage-perl: 6.1-5
libqb0: 1.0.5-1
libspice-server1: 0.14.2-4~pve6+1
lvm2: 2.03.02-pve4
lxc-pve: 3.2.1-1
lxcfs: 3.0.3-pve60
novnc-pve: 1.1.0-1
proxmox-mini-journalreader: 1.1-1
proxmox-widget-toolkit: 2.1-3
pve-cluster: 6.1-4
pve-container: 3.0-21
pve-docs: 6.1-6
pve-edk2-firmware: 2.20200229-1
pve-firewall: 4.0-10
pve-firmware: 3.0-6
pve-ha-manager: 3.0-8
pve-i18n: 2.0-4
pve-qemu-kvm: 4.1.1-3
pve-xtermjs: 4.3.0-1
qemu-server: 6.1-6
smartmontools: 7.1-pve2
spiceterm: 3.1-1
vncterm: 1.6-1
zfsutils-linux: 0.8.3-pve1
When I run apt update and apt upgrade and apt dist-upgrade, there are no new packages available.
By the way: After starting the container with the command lxc-start -n <ID>, the problem with attaching a screen still persists. Maybe this is related to the startup problem?
On this node are a lot of VMs running, so a reboot of the node wouldn't be optimal.
Thank you for help time and your help!
Best Regards
Last edited: