LVM and virtio-scsi - detects volume as complete drive

Firm

Renowned Member
Oct 27, 2015
40
1
73
Hi,

I have successfully created a few VMs on PVE 4.0. Hardware raid (/dev/sda - Dell H730 RAID10) is partitioned like this:

Code:
NAME                     MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda                        8:0    0   2.7T  0 disk
├─sda1                     8:1    0     1M  0 part
└─sda2                     8:2    0   2.7T  0 part
  ├─vg0-root             252:0    0  14.9G  0 lvm  /
  ├─vg0-vm--100--disk--1 252:1    0   100G  0 lvm
  ├─vg0-vm--101--disk--1 252:2    0   512G  0 lvm
  ├─vg0-vm--102--disk--1 252:3    0    16G  0 lvm
  ├─vg0-vm--102--disk--2 252:4    0    64G  0 lvm
  ├─vg0-vm--103--disk--1 252:5    0   512G  0 lvm
  ├─vg0-vm--104--disk--1 252:6    0    16G  0 lvm
  ├─vg0-vm--104--disk--2 252:7    0    64G  0 lvm
  └─vg0-vm--105--disk--1 252:8    0   100G  0 lvm
sdb                        8:16   0 446.6G  0 disk
sdc                        8:32   0 446.6G  0 disk
sdd                        8:48   0 446.6G  0 disk
sde                        8:64   0 446.6G  0 disk

Note: /dev/sdb, /dev/sdc, /dev/sdd, /dev/sde are RAID0 SSD-based single disks also configured through H730 controller.

VM 102 was created using virtio-blk driver all disks:
Code:
virtio0: lvm:vm-102-disk-1,size=16G
virtio1: lvm:vm-102-disk-2,size=64G
virtio2: /dev/sdb,size=457344M
virtio3: /dev/sdc,size=457344M
virtio2 and virtio3 were added manually as PVE UI doesn't allow attaching physical devices. VM (Debian 8.2) works fine although disks are shown as /dev/vdX (due to use of virtio-blk driver).

For VM 104 I used virtio-scsi driver for all disks:
Code:
scsihw: virtio-scsi-pci
scsi0: lvm:vm-104-disk-1,size=16G
scsi1: lvm:vm-104-disk-2,size=64G
scsi2: /dev/sdd,size=457344M
scsi3: /dev/sde,size=457344M
Note: I also tried to remove lvm: prefix and size= prefix - nothing changed.

So the problem 1 is: installer detects both /dev/sda and /dev/sdb as 3TB disks (as /dev/sda on pve host). How can I fix that?
The problem 2 is: I'm not sure if /dev/sdc inside vm104 really maps to /dev/sdd (inspired by problem 1). How can I check if it happened or not? hdparm/smartctl can't access inquiry data on disks.

Any ideas are welcome.

Regards,
 
Last edited:
try to map devices through sata:

virtio0: lvm:vm-102-disk-1,size=16G
virtio1: lvm:vm-102-disk-2,size=64G
sata0: /dev/sdb,size=457344M
sata1: /dev/sdc,size=457344M

or all through sata:

sata0: lvm:vm-102-disk-1,size=16G
sata1: lvm:vm-102-disk-2,size=64G
sata2: /dev/sdb,size=457344M
sata3: /dev/sdc,size=457344M
 
partition /dev/sdb on 1 and check the partition table on 2 to see if they are the same disk.

Checked with hexdump on /dev/vdX devices - they happened to be different. So the problem 2 is not confirmed.

Regards,
 
VM with all sataX drives seems to boot normally and devices look ok (there an error is shown while booting but no traces in syslog).
Code:
NAME   MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda      8:0    0    16G  0 disk
└─sda1   8:1    0    16G  0 part /
sdb      8:16   0    64G  0 disk
sdc      8:32   0 446.6G  0 disk
sdd      8:48   0 446.6G  0 disk

# ls -l /dev/disk/by-id/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:45 ata-QEMU_DVD-ROM_QM00003 -> ../../sr0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:45 ata-QEMU_HARDDISK_QM00005 -> ../../sda
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Oct 28 11:45 ata-QEMU_HARDDISK_QM00005-part1 -> ../../sda1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:45 ata-QEMU_HARDDISK_QM00007 -> ../../sdb
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:45 ata-QEMU_HARDDISK_QM00009 -> ../../sdc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:45 ata-QEMU_HARDDISK_QM00011 -> ../../sdd

But with scsiX (SCSI Controller Type is set to VIRTIO) it recognizes disks with wrong order (but sizes are ok):

Code:
NAME   MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda      8:0    0    16G  0 disk
└─sda1   8:1    0    16G  0 part /
sdb      8:16   0 446.6G  0 disk
sdc      8:32   0    64G  0 disk
sdd      8:48   0 446.6G  0 disk

# ls -l /dev/disk/by-id/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 ata-QEMU_DVD-ROM_QM00003 -> ../../sr0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_drive-scsi0 -> ../../sda
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Oct 28 11:49 scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_drive-scsi0-part1 -> ../../sda1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_drive-scsi1 -> ../../sdc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 scsi-3644a84200d7362001dbcd101b29de295 -> ../../sdb
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 scsi-3644a84200d7362001dbcd223c3e0fe0f -> ../../sdd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 wwn-0x644a84200d7362001dbcd101b29de295 -> ../../sdb
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Oct 28 11:49 wwn-0x644a84200d7362001dbcd223c3e0fe0f -> ../../sdd

Unfortunately I can't reproduce Problem 1 anymore (which is mentioned in original post).

P.S. The naming order of devices is important since they are used as raw devices in service's configuration.
 
Last edited:

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!