William Edwards Well-Known Member Proxmox Subscriber May 20, 2017 174 18 58 Netherlands cyberfusion.io Oct 28, 2019 #1 Why does Proxmox Mail Gateway think this is an invalid CIDR (it's not)?
dcsapak Proxmox Staff Member Staff member Feb 1, 2016 10,145 1,454 273 36 Vienna Oct 28, 2019 #2 we do not allow bigger subnets than /8 why do you want this? as a workaround you can put in 2 networks fc00::/8 and fd00::/8
we do not allow bigger subnets than /8 why do you want this? as a workaround you can put in 2 networks fc00::/8 and fd00::/8
William Edwards Well-Known Member Proxmox Subscriber May 20, 2017 174 18 58 Netherlands cyberfusion.io Oct 28, 2019 #3 dcsapak said: we do not allow bigger subnets than /8 why do you want this? as a workaround you can put in 2 networks fc00::/8 and fd00::/8 Click to expand... Um, why would I not want this? I want my entire IPv6-only DMZ to be able to send mail.
dcsapak said: we do not allow bigger subnets than /8 why do you want this? as a workaround you can put in 2 networks fc00::/8 and fd00::/8 Click to expand... Um, why would I not want this? I want my entire IPv6-only DMZ to be able to send mail.
dcsapak Proxmox Staff Member Staff member Feb 1, 2016 10,145 1,454 273 36 Vienna Oct 28, 2019 #4 yeah but it seem that is only relevant for fd00::/8 The block fc00::/8 is undefined. It has been proposed to be managed by an allocation authority, but this has not gained acceptance in the IETF. Click to expand... from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_local_address also, again you can put 2 trusted networks (fc00::/8 and fd00::/8) in and it should work
yeah but it seem that is only relevant for fd00::/8 The block fc00::/8 is undefined. It has been proposed to be managed by an allocation authority, but this has not gained acceptance in the IETF. Click to expand... from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_local_address also, again you can put 2 trusted networks (fc00::/8 and fd00::/8) in and it should work