I'm trying to understand how the Ceph pools are all working together. Before Proxmox 5.3. On this cluster, I have three nodes with four 2TB drives in each node (for roughly 22 TB total disk space after overhead). I had a single pool with 512 PGs in 3/2 configuration that was used to create a RDB disk image store. Unfortunately, I didn't pay close enough attention to the exact size of storage that created, but currently it sits at 6.5 TB after I created a cephFS storage.
After the 5.3 upgrade, I have added a cephFS storage, using the default 128 PGs (also in 3/2 per default). The corresponding storage size is 5.36TB.
Are these pools completely separate, or are they actually sharing the total OSD space available? If they are separate, how do I determine the size, specifically for the cephFS pool.
I ask because in my cluster, I've historically had separate backup storage configurations, one for a daily backup that keeps 6 days of backups, and a weekly backup that keeps 4 backups. I also have another backup storage for archives of VMs that are no longer in use, but may need to be brought back in the future. To keep that backup scheme, I would need to create two more cephFS pools for weekly and archival backups. I don't want to go creating multiple cephFS entries and pools if that's going to be detrimental.
I'm not sure, but what I am asking may be listed as an experimental feature:
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/experimental-features/
After the 5.3 upgrade, I have added a cephFS storage, using the default 128 PGs (also in 3/2 per default). The corresponding storage size is 5.36TB.
Are these pools completely separate, or are they actually sharing the total OSD space available? If they are separate, how do I determine the size, specifically for the cephFS pool.
I ask because in my cluster, I've historically had separate backup storage configurations, one for a daily backup that keeps 6 days of backups, and a weekly backup that keeps 4 backups. I also have another backup storage for archives of VMs that are no longer in use, but may need to be brought back in the future. To keep that backup scheme, I would need to create two more cephFS pools for weekly and archival backups. I don't want to go creating multiple cephFS entries and pools if that's going to be detrimental.
I'm not sure, but what I am asking may be listed as an experimental feature:
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/experimental-features/
Last edited: