Both are well tested. I think most homelabbers are either using NUCs for low power or V2/V3/V4 Xeons for bang for the buck. But yeah, they are quite old and EoL, so not that reliable anymore and not great for production because of possible data loss and downtime.So, V3 or V4?
In addition to that: You have to consider if you want fast single core performance, or a multiload of parallel processing. E5-2699V4 is a beast, but only with respect to cores. If you're virtualized application cannot take advantage of that, go with higher frequency. We always go for highest frequency and two processors due to the used virtualized software.so choose the fastest one you can afford.
Nope.The v3 xeon uses ddr3, hence might be a lot more affordable. I don't have current prices in mind but when comparing v3/v4 back in the days one of the main differences was the used men technology.
For average workloads (e.g. no heavy number crunching) I decided for myself that v4 was not worth it as the gap was not big enough over all.
Long story short: imho you should compare whole system (TCO) not only the processor.
They're all fully compatible with Proxmox. if you describe your workload/usecase, more useful recommendations may follow.Which CPU has better compatibility for proxmox
1) Xeon E5-2680V4 , Xeon E5-2699V4
2) Xeon E5-2690V3 , Xeon E5-2696V3
So, V3 or V4?
I could swear that the systems we have measured were v3 and ddr3 but you are right. Ark is the source of truth...all FCLGA2011-3 socket CPUs use DDR4 memory, including haswell. check ark if you have doubt they're more "affordable" cause they're older.