FSYNCS/SECOND: 5.19

L

losta87

Member
Aug 4, 2020
4
0
21
37
Hello, first of all thank any response that helps me to solve the problem.

I have read that it is not the best to have a software raid configured and I have it like this.

The specific test:

root @ proxmox01 ~ # pveperf / var / lib / vz /
CPU BOGOMIPS: 54404.16
REGEX / SECOND: 3304415
HD SIZE: 3633.81 GB (/ dev / md2)
BUFFERED READS: 64.48 MB / sec
AVERAGE SEEK TIME: 36.69 ms
FSYNCS / SECOND: 5.19
EXT DNS: 15.41 ms


RAID:

root@proxmox01 ~ # mdadm --detail /dev/md2
/dev/md2:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Jan 8 15:50:03 2020
Raid Level : raid0
Array Size : 3872157696 (3692.78 GiB 3965.09 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Wed Jan 8 15:50:03 2020
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Chunk Size : 512K

Consistency Policy : none

Name : rescue:2
UUID : d09da0ee:6413061f:ddc4876d:9f375754
Events : 0

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 3 0 active sync /dev/sda3
1 8 19 1 active sync /dev/sdb3
 
Alwin said:
Well, mdraid is not supported by us. But best run a storage benchmark to see what you get out of it.
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Benchmarking_Storage
Click to expand...



This is the result, is it correct? Does proxmox work well this way?



Code: 
root@proxmox01 ~ # fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --sync=1 --rw=read --bs=4K --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --name seq_read --filename=/dev/md2
seq_read: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-3.12
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1)][100.0%][r=74.0MiB/s][r=18.9k IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
seq_read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=29268: Wed Aug  5 10:21:10 2020
  read: IOPS=17.7k, BW=69.2MiB/s (72.5MB/s)(4150MiB/60001msec)
    slat (usec): min=2, max=233, avg= 3.65, stdev= 2.09
    clat (nsec): min=1124, max=79172k, avg=51668.47, stdev=551235.38
     lat (usec): min=33, max=79203, avg=55.41, stdev=551.35
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[   32],  5.00th=[   33], 10.00th=[   33], 20.00th=[   34],
     | 30.00th=[   35], 40.00th=[   36], 50.00th=[   37], 60.00th=[   39],
     | 70.00th=[   40], 80.00th=[   41], 90.00th=[   43], 95.00th=[   47],
     | 99.00th=[   64], 99.50th=[   97], 99.90th=[  412], 99.95th=[11207],
     | 99.99th=[26084]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=  656, max=94912, per=100.00%, avg=71408.54, stdev=16317.65, samples=119
   iops        : min=  164, max=23728, avg=17852.10, stdev=4079.41, samples=119
  lat (usec)   : 2=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=96.98%, 100=2.54%
  lat (usec)   : 250=0.38%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.03%, 20=0.03%, 50=0.02%
  lat (msec)   : 100=0.01%
  cpu          : usr=3.30%, sys=9.32%, ctx=1062413, majf=0, minf=12
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=1062273,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=69.2MiB/s (72.5MB/s), 69.2MiB/s-69.2MiB/s (72.5MB/s-72.5MB/s), io=4150MiB (4351MB), run=60001-60001msec

Disk stats (read/write):
    md2: ios=1062067/2401, merge=0/0, ticks=0/0, in_queue=0, util=0.00%, aggrios=531292/1086, aggrmerge=182/409, aggrticks=29092/11802, aggrin_queue=18760, aggrutil=70.58%
  sdb: ios=531221/975, merge=92/406, ticks=27989/12417, in_queue=18468, util=69.70%
  sda: ios=531363/1197, merge=272/413, ticks=30195/11188, in_queue=19052, util=70.58%




Code: 
root@proxmox01 ~ # fio --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --sync=1 --rw=read --bs=1M --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --name seq_read --filename=/dev/md2
seq_read: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (W) 1024KiB-1024KiB, (T) 1024KiB-1024KiB, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-3.12
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1)][100.0%][r=202MiB/s][r=202 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
seq_read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=29871: Wed Aug  5 10:23:05 2020
  read: IOPS=214, BW=214MiB/s (225MB/s)(12.6GiB/60088msec)
    slat (usec): min=25, max=23212, avg=49.68, stdev=204.50
    clat (usec): min=952, max=223072, avg=4594.92, stdev=12852.71
     lat (usec): min=993, max=223108, avg=4644.86, stdev=12857.21
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[   996],  5.00th=[  1004], 10.00th=[  1012], 20.00th=[  1037],
     | 30.00th=[  2769], 40.00th=[  2900], 50.00th=[  2999], 60.00th=[  3032],
     | 70.00th=[  3392], 80.00th=[  3654], 90.00th=[  3720], 95.00th=[  8291],
     | 99.00th=[ 63177], 99.50th=[122160], 99.90th=[143655], 99.95th=[152044],
     | 99.99th=[204473]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=49152, max=307200, per=100.00%, avg=219679.23, stdev=56072.67, samples=120
   iops        : min=   48, max=  300, avg=214.53, stdev=54.76, samples=120
  lat (usec)   : 1000=2.59%
  lat (msec)   : 2=22.02%, 4=68.78%, 10=2.05%, 20=2.11%, 50=1.41%
  lat (msec)   : 100=0.09%, 250=0.96%
  cpu          : usr=0.10%, sys=1.36%, ctx=12899, majf=0, minf=267
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwts: total=12873,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=214MiB/s (225MB/s), 214MiB/s-214MiB/s (225MB/s-225MB/s), io=12.6GiB (13.5GB), run=60088-60088msec

Disk stats (read/write):
    md2: ios=26309/1767, merge=0/0, ticks=0/0, in_queue=0, util=0.00%, aggrios=13016/970, aggrmerge=157/202, aggrticks=45721/20139, aggrin_queue=40554, aggrutil=61.85%
  sdb: ios=13006/927, merge=92/198, ticks=42981/19489, in_queue=38904, util=61.85%
  sda: ios=13027/1013, merge=222/206, ticks=48461/20790, in_queue=42204, util=61.84%
 
losta87 said:
This is the result, is it correct? Does proxmox work well this way?
Click to expand...
That's a very broad question. And it needs to be answered by yourselves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom