V Vasilij Lebedinskij Renowned Member Jan 30, 2016 65 3 73 39 Jul 4, 2016 #1 Hello! I would like to install teamviewer on my PVE host but it requires frame buffer. How can i enable it?
Hello! I would like to install teamviewer on my PVE host but it requires frame buffer. How can i enable it?
LnxBil Distinguished Member Feb 21, 2015 9,458 1,673 273 Saarland, Germany Jul 5, 2016 #2 I have never seen an install of Proxmox without framebuffer, so it should already work as expected. Please try Code: dmesg | grep fb Every machine I tried, this yields the fb0 device, e.g. Code: [ 3.829718] fbcon: mgadrmfb (fb0) is primary device [ 4.440343] mgag200 0000:01:04.0: fb0: mgadrmfb frame buffer device I'm curious why someone would want to have Teamviewer if one already has SSH? There is no point in having a less secure solution.
I have never seen an install of Proxmox without framebuffer, so it should already work as expected. Please try Code: dmesg | grep fb Every machine I tried, this yields the fb0 device, e.g. Code: [ 3.829718] fbcon: mgadrmfb (fb0) is primary device [ 4.440343] mgag200 0000:01:04.0: fb0: mgadrmfb frame buffer device I'm curious why someone would want to have Teamviewer if one already has SSH? There is no point in having a less secure solution.
fireon Distinguished Member Proxmox Subscriber Oct 25, 2010 4,466 464 153 Austria/Graz deepdoc.at Jul 5, 2016 #3 LnxBil said: I'm curious why someone would want to have Teamviewer if one already has SSH? There is no point in having a less secure solution. Click to expand... This makes also no sense for me. But maybe he need an Desktop first: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Workstations_with_Proxmox_VE_and_X11
LnxBil said: I'm curious why someone would want to have Teamviewer if one already has SSH? There is no point in having a less secure solution. Click to expand... This makes also no sense for me. But maybe he need an Desktop first: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Workstations_with_Proxmox_VE_and_X11